Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

3:39 a.m. • 2-11-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 52° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Rezoning Battle Could Affect Raleigh Neighborhoods


e-mail print friendly
Rezoning Battle Could Affect Raleigh Neighborhoods
Rezoning Battle Could Affect Raleigh Neighborhoods

In one of the city's largest rezoning requests in recent memory, a community group wants to limit what types of homes people are allowed to build in two neighborhoods north of downtown.

An organization known as Community Scale wants to rezone 141 lots – nearly 66 acres – in the Fallon Park and Anderson Heights neighborhoods from R-10 and R-6 to R-4. The move would limit efforts to subdivide lots to build additional houses by requiring larger lots and setbacks.

Larry McBennett of Community Scale said the change, which will be debated in a public hearing Tuesday, would help preserve the integrity of the neighborhoods.

"All we're asking for in scale is that, as things change, the neighborhoods be taken into consideration – that the end result be a win-win for everybody," McBennett said. "We're not talking about changing the status quo, but confirming it."

A city report released Friday showed that almost 600 homes had been torn down in neighborhoods inside the Interstate 440 Beltline and replaced by houses that were usually much larger.

McBennett and others backing the rezoning said the change would limit additions and tear-down replacements that encroach on neighboring yards. It also would reflect a comprehensive approach for the Fallon Park and Anderson heights neighborhoods, parts of which were rezoned R-4 about 20 years ago.

"We object to nitpicking a neighborhood – taking one house here, one house there, bit-by bit, just nibbling the neighborhood to death – so that it's no longer desirable," he said.

If the zoning were changed, 11 property owners would find their homes out of compliance with the new regulations, according to the city Planning Department. Another 30 homeowners would be denied the right to subdivide their lots, the Planning Department said.

Foster Sikes said he would like to build two small homes, including one for his mother, on a lot he owns in the neighborhood.

"I'd much prefer to put two houses that would be more in character with the neighborhood," Sikes said. "Taste is subjective. How do we legislate taste? That's what they're trying to do right now with the zoning is a step toward trying to legislate taste."

RELATED TOPICS: Raleigh

e-mail print friendly

27 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 27 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
fyi: the houses you refer to were approved by scale group members in attendance at the CAC meeting. 16-0, they supported the developer,, the people fighting this group are homeowners NOT developers.

JeffLebo:

I petitioned to have my original zoning reinstated for two houses .22 acre lots with a max. of 2990 sq ft and offstreet parking, 28 ft high etc... and the Scale members said this would ruin the area. Please don't lecture me on big,, that is subjective as you say and shouldn't be legislated unless you can prove a devaluation in your property.

Again take emotion out of it and look what is best for the whole as a city instead of what is best for your taste.

"These houses aren't that big."

I guess it depends on what your definition of "big" is. If you're plopping a 4500 sq. ft. house on a .10 of an acre where before sat a 1500 sq. ft. bungalow, I'd consider that 3x is "big." It is funny that 4500 sq. ft. houses have a parking pad for ONE car. Smarts!

These houses aren't that big. Some are built tall because they are in a flood plain. Some houses are close to the streets because they are on a hill, while others across the street are set further back because they are on the top of a hill.

When you put more restrictive limits on homeowners you are hurting people not builders. Homeowners can't afford to fight city hall builders can. This REZONING is a small group with a napoleon complex. They won't debate me, nor engage others with any sort of compromise. They spin they want a win-win situation when they don't even speak with people who have a differing opinion.

I would love to have a public debate with SCALE. Any takers?

not due to a bubble, but due to accrued interest they must pay out of the proceed of the sale. A housing bubble is where the houses are appraised for more than the market will withstand, but demand will support it, then demand dries up and the sales stop, thus driving down prices. This has not, seemingly, occurred to anything in the Five points ITB area, as shown by sales data. Even where OTB sales have slowed, ITB still hums along. Why? Because people who can afford the prices can generally afford them in most any kind of market. Therefore, they are going to buy what they want and what they want is to be close to downtown where they work without having to get on the beltline.

View Comments VIEW ALL 27 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here