Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

7:21 p.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Sat: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 52° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

WRAL, Other Media Seek Access to Murder Trial


e-mail print friendly
Mark Bowling
Mark Bowling

Attorneys for WRAL and other media outlets on Monday filed a motion to block an attempt by a former Rocky Mount funeral home owner charged with having his wife killed to exclude the public from pre-trial hearings and have all records in the case sealed.

Mark Bowling is charged with first-degree murder in the death of his wife, Julie, who was found shot to death Dec. 8 inside the couple's garage.

Investigators said Rose Vincent pulled the trigger but that Bowling helped her plan the slaying. Bowling and Vincent were in a romantic relationship, according to authorities.

Bowling's attorneys cited intense publicity in asking for limits on public disclosure about the case.

They filed a motion in June asking that all pre-trial hearings be closed to the media and public, that a gag order be issued to prevent attorneys, witnesses and others connected with the case from commenting publicly about it, that all court records in the case be sealed until at least the start of the trial and that cameras be barred from the trial.

But attorneys for the media outlets argued that the U.S. and state constitutions allow for open court proceedings. They contend in their filings that Bowling's attorneys are speculating that media coverage would prevent him from receiving a fair trial.

"Closure of hearings and evidence in this proceeding will only lead to speculation and misunderstanding – and possible suspicion – about the administration of justice," the media's court filings state. "The defendant has in no way demonstrated why this case is extraordinary so as to justify closure of the proceedings."

The next pre-trial hearing in the case will likely be next week, prosecutors said.

e-mail print friendly

12 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 12 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
If the pretrial wouldn't HELP Bowling then I would say go ahead - If would somehow distract the trials constitution - I would say not to allow it.

I want him to have a fair trial - but I want more for Julie to see and have a fair trial and she is NOT there to defend herself.

oh again since its about a white person , wral lets comments fly , but let it be about those thugs of other colors and illegals ,oh no we have to sensor it all

It it our right to have an open case - the public should be allowed in, including the press - maybe not tv cameras, but reporters. Nothing should be sealed, nothing should be excluded except those matters held in conference with the judge in chambers outside of the jurors eyes & ears. Public Trial! No Private Trial.

Bowling is ugly. Ugly people have no business on TV. No cameras.

"lead to speculation and misunderstanding – and possible suspicion" Like media wouldn't spin it for ratings using the above regardless. This is a constitutional issue over which has higher precedence, the first or the sixth amendment. My personal opinion is that the rights of the individual outweigh the rights of the many. This guy should get a fair trial and the media can report it after the fact. I also don't think having cameras in the courtroom serve the public interest.

View Comments VIEW ALL 12 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here