Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

7:26 a.m. • 2-11-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 41° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Private Money May Prove to Be Best Route to Toll Roads


e-mail print friendly
Public-Private Plan May Be Option for Toll Roads
Public-Private Plan May Be Option for Toll Roads

Does North Carolina need toll roads badly enough to pay private companies to build and operate them?

The answer may be “yes,” and the tolls would likely be higher and be collected for more years if the answer turns out to be a public-private partnership.

Many state lawmakers are pushing for a special legislative session on transportation issues. With the proposed Triangle Expressway front and center in current discussions, money for toll roads would be a central issue.

There was an attempt as the Legislature wound up its regular session last week to find $20 million for the Expressway from the Durham Freeway to Interstate 540, but lawmakers could not settle on a plan in both chambers before time ran out.

If the state does not put up money to get things started, however, turnpike officials are trying to keep their options open.

“If we can't do that and there's not a special session, our executive committee has asked us to look at a public-private partnership,” said David Joyner, executive director of the North Carolina Turnpike Authority.

While most toll roads are publicly built, private companies constructed and now run toll roads in three states. The companies paid to build the roads and are recouping their investments from toll revenue.

“Maybe it would make some sense,” Joyner said. “We've had one company that has expressed an interest in maybe doing that along those lines, but the plan would have to have total transparency. The way we're looking at it, the public would know what the terms would be.”

The Legislature would still have to sign off on any public-private partnership, and at least one lawmaker has mixed feelings.

“Generally speaking, you find the private sector doing things pretty well. The difference here, though, is a private company would have to try to make a profit off a highway,” Sen. Richard Stevens, R-Wake, said.

In Texas, a group of foreign investors funded a public-private toll road.

“The idea of a foreign country or foreign investors owning our roads, that bothers me a great deal. We don't need to do that,” Stevens said.

A Turnpike Authority spokesperson said that with inflation, the cost of building a toll road goes up $2.5 million a month while the debate swirls.

In addition to the Triangle Expressway, The Turnpike Authority is considering the public-private solution for four other projects.

They are: the Mid-Currituck bridge, spanning from Barco to Corolla on the Outer Banks; the Monroe Connector around U.S. 74 in Monroe County; the Cape Fear Skyway, a bridge over the Cape Fear River into Wilmington; and the Gaston Garden Parkway, connecting Gaston to I-485 around Charlotte.

  • Reporter:
  • Photographer: Don Ingle
  • Web Editor: Ron Gallagher

RELATED TOPICS: Cape Fear River, Durham, Cape Fear High School

e-mail print friendly

131 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 131 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
NeverSurrender= Ok thanks for clearing that up.

"What does this mean then?"

---

That the person making that statement didn't fully understand that the state would retain title to the land/road even in a public-private partnership, they did understand it and misspoke, or they understand it and are engaging in a bit of fear-mongering about those durned furriners and their investments to try to scuttle the idea.

Operating under the presumption of assuming stupidity rather than malice until proven otherwise, I'm voting for option #2.

Corporations aren't evil and government (and taxes) are not either. If a corporation builds the road, they'll want (rightfully so) to make a profit. If government builds it, they won't do it as effiently. We can't expect companies to give up profit, so we should push our government to do the job well. Government can do a good job if we let them. Maybe we could allow them to give good contractors preferential treatment. They come in on time and on budget reliably, so they win even if their bid is 7% higher than a new contractor or 15% higher than a bad one.

I suggested raising the gas tax earlier and nobody even blinked, that should tell the legislature that people really hate tolls. We can live with taxes that provide a real service and are fair.

Since ya'll brought it up, I think a real rail system is a great idea. Better to start now than later.

“The idea of a foreign country or foreign investors owning our roads, that bothers me a great deal. We don't need to do that,” Stevens said.

What does this mean then?

"the idea of selling our roads to private intrest is about the most stupid idea out of Raleigh lately and there has been some real dumb ones lately."

---

That's not the proposal being floated. The private company would merely be contracted to build the road and collect the tolls as reimbursement. The state would still "own" the road.

View Comments VIEW ALL 131 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here