Durham, N.C. — Patients exposed to surgical instruments washed in hydraulic fluid at two Duke University Health System hospitals suffered no more subsequent health problems than people in general, according to a report issued Thursday.
Tainted surgical instruments were used on about 3,650 patients at Duke University Raleigh Hospital and Durham Regional Hospital in late 2004. A contractor drained used elevator hydraulic fluid into empty barrels that were labeled as detergent, and the fluid was later used to wash surgical instruments.
Duke Health officials have maintained that the hydraulic fluid would have no impact because the instruments were sterilized after being washed. But outraged patients – some of whom had complained of health problems following their surgeries – demanded that the hospital system monitor their health in case they developed problems.
PharmaLink-FHI, a Durham-based private health research firm hired by Duke Health, reported in a new study that almost 90 percent of the exposed patients had no major clinical problems in the past two years. Another 8.6 percent had been hospitalized since their exposure, while 2.5 percent reported an infection and 1.8 percent had died.
The average time between exposure and subsequent hospitalization was more than six months, according to the report. Likewise, patients who developed infections did so several months after exposure, the report stated, concluding that no correlation could be made between the two events.
"When compared with expected medical outcome rates, the PharmaLink-FHI registry did not identify any rates that were increased above those expected of a general or similar patient population," the report stated.



![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/out_and_about/2012/02/02/10702427/pics_britt53446-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wralsportsfan.com/asset/basketball/2012/02/09/10705803/10705803-1328766083-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/travel/2012/02/08/10704761/10704761-1328743348-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wralsportsfan.com/asset/colleges/2012/02/08/10705323/austin-100x75.jpg)






WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
July 29, 2007 7:18 a.m.
July 28, 2007 8:02 a.m.
I am so sorry. I cannot imagine the pain you must be in.
July 28, 2007 8:01 a.m.
Not my intentions at all, our daughter passed away a year before this incident happened. Though I agree that a lot of people would see this as a payday. I don't even like to hear the word Duke and hospital in the same sentence
July 28, 2007 2:25 a.m.
The only impact that hydraulic fluid had on anyone was increasing their propensity to sue.
It doesn't even make a bit of sense that overwhelmingly minute and temporary exposure to brake fluid would cause any problems. And sterile brake fluid at that. I've had significantly more than that get into cuts over the years.
Sorry about your loss and any health problems you may have, but a sterile, micro-thin, brake fluid film on surgical instruments is not the cause of them.
You're gonna have to find another target for a payday if that is your intentions.
July 27, 2007 10:27 p.m.