Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

6:58 a.m. • 2-11-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 41° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Bar Association Hopes to Help Public Judge Judges


e-mail print friendly
Bar Association Hopes to Help Public Judge Judges
Bar Association Hopes to Help Public Judge Judges

Picking a judge on Election Day can be a guessing game for many voters.

That’s why the North Carolina Bar Association is launching a pilot program to give the public more information about the men and women on the bench.

Judges with whom WRAL spoke said they are OK with the program, as long as the process is fair.

The program involves attorneys and other court personnel evaluating judges. The Bar Association would then share those reviews with voters at election time.

“It’s very important that we're all very professional and give people the same respect that is due in any kind of public setting,” said Wake County District Judge Kristin Ruth.

Defense attorneys say they're in as long as they are granted anonymity and the criteria are appropriate.

“I've no problem evaluating a judge and being very honest about it,” said Bill Young, a defense attorney. “Based on how they treat the public, how they treat lawyers, the judicial demeanor.”

But Wake County District Attorney Colon Willoughby said he worries that some people filling out the evaluations could be biased and might not do the judges justice.

“I think getting more information is the right thing to do,” Willoughby said. “The way we get that information and how we collect it is the sticky wicket.”

The goal of the program is that even if you have never set foot in a courtroom you have an idea about the judges among whom you can choose on Election Day.

The pilot program starts this fall, and the Bar Association hopes to evaluate all of the state's 450 judges by the fall of 2008.

RELATED TOPICS: Wake County

e-mail print friendly

15 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 15 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
A fairer system would be to give statistics on judges' performance every year. Post how many cases they delayed/continued and reasons (ie personal etc), how many sex offenders/child molesters they let go, how many not guilty vs guilty decisions made, etc. That's more reliable than letting attorneys rate them.

Wow! This has potential for disaster! I believe there must be checks and balances but caution is needed here! Maybe the public should be encouraged to sit in on some cases to become better aware of the judicial system. I've had the opportunity to do this several times as a potential juror. The judge I've been most impressed by is Judge Donald Stephens. If you want to see professionalism in the courtroom sit in on some of his courts. If all courtrooms are managed the way his is then I have complete faith in the courts. I've been to other courtrooms and have had the opposite feeling in some of them. And stories you hear about various judges in the news make you a little unsure also. Judge Stephens is a role model for how it should be in my opinion. And, no, I do not know him or anything about him other than what I've seen.

All judges put their pants on, one leg at a time. Unless you're that judge up in DC that lost his pants.

I'm totally against lawyers judging/evaluating Judges. I'm assuming the Chief Justice has a Judicial peer review board/commission, they meet quarterly to review complaints from lawyers and the public, take appropriate action and make the entire process open to the public in as much as personnel laws will allow. Otherwise, the voting public can decide at election time given a Judge's stats - how many he let slide on DUI's, speeding, letting accused rapist out on bond, setting low bond for spousal abuse cases, etc. Let the Judge defend his/her own record of fairness, efficiency, leniency, harshness to their district citizens. We, the people, shall decide.

I think we can trust lawyers and the public to be fair in judging judges. The evaluators will be able to see "sour grapes." And if a lawyer has had a case unfairly go against them, they have a point; if it was fair and justice, they know they do not.

I hope this reflects on those judges who let a rapist out on bond, only to have them rape again in the interim - or murder, or rob.

God bless.

Rev. RB

View Comments VIEW ALL 15 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here