Local News

Panelists: Lacrosse Case an Example of What Not to Do

Posted June 27, 2007

Map Marker  Find News Near Me

— Most of the coverage surrounding disbarred former Durham County District Attorney Mike Nifong is over. But he is still in the spotlight as the subject of a course for attorneys and lawyers in training on what not to do as a prosecutor.

"One of the things I learned, and I think we all need to learn is this case re-emphasizes the importance of communication and professionalism between lawyers," Nifong's former attorney, David Freedman, said Wednesday during a panel discussion on prosecutor misconduct at the North Carolina State University McKimmon Center Wednesday.

But panel members went beyond problems with prosecutors and pointed out what they call a "culture of indifference" in the justice system as a whole.

"I think what happened in the lacrosse case -- that is the intervention of public officials and Bar officials -- is extraordinary, not what ordinarily happens," Duke University Law Professor James Coleman said. "And I think that is unfortunate."

Some panelists offered solutions.

"We're asking the criminal justice system to, maybe, do more than it should," Duke law Professor Michael Tigar said. "And if we looked into alternatives, like community policing, like diversion programs, then we could spend more time on every case."

"Prosecutors, judges -- the whole system needs close public scrutiny," Wake County District Attorney Colon Willioughby said. "The public is well served when we scrutinize closely what we do and we make sure we do it in the right way."

4 Comments

Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • WXYZ Jun 28, 2007

    "What not to do"....? First, stop calling it the "Lacross Case" and start calling it the "Crystal Mangum Lies Case" or the "Nifong Believes Lying Prostitute" case; or the "Nifong Exploits Racism in Durham" case; or the "How Much Corruption is There in The Durham DA's Office" case; or the "How Many Lies Can A DA Get Away With?" case; or "How To Exploit Racism to Get Elected" case....

  • Nancy Jun 28, 2007

    Funny, Irving Joyner, Law professor from NCCU who believed the case had merit, even after the rape charge was dropped, was present at the meeting but there is no quote from him. Guess he didn't have much to say to the media or at the event at all.

    Not suprised he's quiet now.

  • Steve Crisp Jun 28, 2007

    Only one problem with their approach. Instead of focusing on "training on what not to do as a prosecutor" and "the importance of communication and professionalism between lawyers," why don't they focus on how it is bad for a DA to lie and hide evidence to everyone involved in a high-profile case just to get elected? That would make a lot more sense than their apparent feel-good solutions.

  • bornbredtarheel Jun 27, 2007

    "Lacrosse case an example of what not to do"...gee, ya think?