Local News

2 Fayetteville Men Charged With Child Sex Crimes

Posted May 24, 2007
Updated May 25, 2007

— Sheriff's deputies Thursday charged two men with sex crimes against children in unrelated incidents.

Daniel Buczkowski, 51, of 2546 Muriel Drive, Fayetteville, was arrested at his home after concerned citizens alerted authorities about his alleged relationship with his 10-year-old victim, officials said.

Investigators later discovered inappropriate pictures involving children on his home computer and more charges may be forthcoming, according to Cumberland County Sheriff's Office officials.

Deputies arrested Terry Lee Bilodeau, 31, of 2627 Lindsey Drive in Fayetteville, and charged him with kidnapping and raping an 11-year-old girl.

Investigators said they learned about Bilodeau after the victim disclosed information about the assault to her mother.

Buczkowski is charged with first-degree forcible rape, first-degree forcible sexual offense and taking indecent liberties with a minor.

He was held in the Cumberland County Detention Center under a $100,000 secured bond and scheduled for a court  appearance in District Courtroom 2-C at 9 a.m. Friday.

Charges lodged against Bilodeau were first-degree statutory rape, first-degree statutory sex offense, first-degree kidnapping, child abuse sexual act, taking indecent liberties with a child and incest.

Bilodeau also was held in the Cumberland County Detention Center under a $150,300 secured bond and scheduled for arraignment in court at the same time as Buczkowski.


Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • lollly52 May 26, 2007

    Leave all of their kind on a lonely island in the Pacific. Leave them one half the food they will need. Now let the REAL predator games begin!!! Enjoy yourselves guys - literally.

  • lorirn4321 May 26, 2007

    One word: CASTRATION, it would save a lot of money in incarceration and would would work much better than rehab

  • pokeygail May 25, 2007

    I have 3 kids 2 girls and one boy and speaking as a parent I can honestly say I do not believe a child molester,rapists,murders whatever have a place to live in the world.To me it takes a real sick (bleep) to touch a child.I don't care if you are a man or a woman! So no I don't belive people can be rehabilitated!! As far as a comment I read up here about no man can determine who lives or dies well maybe you should tell the families of those parents,friends,kids and so on that of ones whom have been murdered for senseless crimes!!

  • Builder03 May 25, 2007

    I would like a doctor's perspective on this. On terrorists, rapists, murderers, why can't we perform a lobotomy and put these, then mellow brainless soles into a career of menial jobs for the state or federal government...or have I watched too many old movies?

  • NotFromHere May 25, 2007

    First of all, Rocknhorse, a prison is supposed to be a place of humane incarceration. The sole purpose of concentration camps was either mass exection or forced labor followed by exection. Lets not disrespect the millions upon millions who lost their lives in the concentration camps by camparing them to prisons.

    Secondly, it has never been proven that all perpetrators of sexual assault cannot be rehabilitated. No where will you find any scientific evidence to back up your claim.

    Finally, I did not say I wanted these people on the streets, I did not say I wanted them paroled. Life in prison is fine with me. I said I do not believe in adding them to the list offenses for which we pull out the electric chair.

  • Rocknhorse May 25, 2007

    There is a difference in executing ciminals and genecide. Based on your argument, then any prison would be considered an concentration camp b/c we have forcefully imprisoned a group of people against their will I'm sure. I understand if you have a position against capital punishment. It's a tough decision for some and I respect that. But there are monsters out there who cannot/will not be rehabillitated. We could compare them to rabid animals. Would you feel that rabid animals should be euthenized? Or do you feel they should be allowed to roam neighborhoods, endangering people and risking the spread of the disease? To me, if these men are found guilty of raping children, well, then I see no difference between them and rabid animals. They are both a menace to society.

  • JustDontUnderstandPpl May 25, 2007

    don't believe any man has the right to decide who lives and who dies. That is not a decision men should make. First we execute murderers, the child molesters, then rapists, the unborn. Who else you want on the list? Maybe the mentally handicapped? The terminally ill? Homosexuals? -notfromhere

    Would you mind telling this to the criminals? And then please see if you can enforce it with them. It is beyond ridiculous to suggest that because CRIMINALS are executed that the mentally ill, terminally ill, etc are next. You appear to be one of those people who just want to stir others up.
    I am sure that if it came down to a decision between killing another human or having that human kill your child, you'd kill the person threatening your child. If not, and you have kids now, please turn them over to someone who will protect them.

  • Rocknhorse May 25, 2007

    NotFromHere, what do you propose for those who rape and murder? Life in prison, parole? What about the J. Dahmers, or the man who kidnapped, raped and burried alive the little girl in Florida (Jessica Lunsford). He'd been convicted and let go, only to do the same crime and worse. For so many I do beleive in rehab, but a pedophile is a sick, derranged person for whom it's been proven there is no cure. And no, that sickness doesn't descriminate between male and female and yes, there are female pedophiles out there as well. What would you propose for those who are so sick that they hurt little children in such a way?

  • jcrew1979 May 25, 2007


  • Rocknhorse May 25, 2007

    NotFromHere-the charge is kidnap and RAPE of an 11 year old girl. That is the person to whom I think execution is the correct answer. The other, all I know from what I read is that they were having "relations" with a 10 year old. Should those "relations" reveal they were having sex and/or sexually assaulting them in some way, then they too should be executed. Just as any teacher (male or female) who has SEX with a child. That is not the same as the situation you describe. Should I ever sexually assault a child, you wouldn't have to wait in line to pull the trigger, I would flip that switch myself! There is a world of difference in sexual assault and photos of a babies bottom. The difference is sexual in nature and if you don't see the difference, then I dare say you should stay away from kids.