Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

2:51 p.m. • 2-12-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Mon: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F
  • Tue: Rain.
    • Hi: 53° F
  • Wed: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 57° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Arrest Warrant Issued for Former Durham Sheriff's Office Employee


e-mail print friendly
Kim Perkins
Kim Perkins

Durham County Sheriff's Office has issued an arrest warrant for a former employee, who is charged with embezzling money from the sheriff's department.

Sheriff Worth Hill had refused to name the former employee who authorities said confessed to stealing thousands of dollars, saying only the employee worked in the civil division.

According to a warrant issued Wednesday, a woman named Kim Perkins was charged with embezzlement. Perkins was a one-time employee of the year, who worked for the sheriff's office's civil processing division from May 2003 until last month. She had been employed, though, since May 1999.

But the sheriff's office has not served the warrant, saying it is a complex case.

Hill said at least $21,000 is missing and thousands more dollars could still be unaccounted for. The office plans to hire an outside forensic auditor but says it could take months before the scope of the situation is known.

The sheriff's office would not say if anyone else could be involved.

Perkins was unavailable for comment Friday.

RELATED TOPICS: Durham County, Durham

e-mail print friendly

19 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 19 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
There could be any number of reasons that she hasn't gotten served yet. It could just be that they haven't been able to find her to serve her.

"There maybe a reason why she has not been served yet, and to be honest with u its really not our concern why she hasnt been."

It is absolutely our concern. Most of the time there is no real backstory to events that are of any significance. But it is the job of the press to determine that for the general population and report it as such. There are times, though, that silence is the result of a coverup, incompetence, complacency, or criminal involvement of the very people who are charged with making or enforcing the law. That is where the press becomes critical in mantaining an informed society.

And if the press is not getting the full story, or at least getting enough to know that a coverup is not involved, then how do we know who is honest and who is not? Not every citizen who cares about the fiduciary responsibility of its officials can conduct their own investigation. That is the very reason why we have the press and why they are protected by the First Amendment.

Ok... has anyone looked and thought of the whole pic... She Confessed!!! All these yrs, 99 is when she started. Right?? Why? No one had noticed the money missing until now... Come on!!! Maybe coverin for someone or maybe she had a life changin matter and feels guilty.. No one knows!!! There maybe a reason why she has not been served yet, and to be honest with u its really not our concern why she hasnt been.. Our local Sheriff's Office has it all under control...

Easy, mttndreamn. I live in Durham, am not taking anything from anyone, and love it here. There's a real sense of community amongst my neighbors and I that has evaporated from the rest of the triangle, with all the New Jersey-ites moving in. One bad person does not a bad city make. And we aren't sure that she's guilty yet, are we? I thought that people were innocent until proven guilty in this country.

Did I make the claim that pocket warrants were available in North Carolina? Or did I make the claim that the Patriot Act is not federal? Yet you automatically assume that such was the issue. The issue was your claim that all warrants are public; they are not and I gave you two examples. You chose to read what you wanted. You graphically demonstrate that you have difficulty reading the face meaning of plain English, then call me stupid?

Next...I'm done with this one...

View Comments VIEW ALL 19 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here