Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

11:12 p.m. • 2-9-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Fri: Rain.
    • Hi: 58° F
  • Sat: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 54° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Alert

  • Breaking News:  Cary police arrested a man Thursday night who allegedly tried to strike an officer with his vehicle in the parking lot of Buffalo Lanes bowling alley on High House Road. He missed the officer and struck a police vehicle, at which point, the officer fired one shot. The suspect was not hit.

State's High Court to Consider Dram-Shop Liability Laws


e-mail print friendly
State's High Court to Consider Dram-Shop Liability Laws
State's High Court to Consider Dram-Shop Liability Laws

What responsibility do bars and restaurants have to keep drunken drivers off the roads?

The North Carolina Supreme Court is taking up the debate to better define dram-shop liability laws.

The case is based on a 2004 case in Durham in which a jury found the restaurant Torero's II financially liable in the death of Michael Hall. A Torero's customer who left the restaurant drunk killed Hall in 1997.

Hall's widow, Theresa Hall, sued for negligence and was awarded more than $1 million, but Durham County Superior Court Judge Abraham Jones set aside the verdict.

Hall then took the case to the state Supreme Court.

"They have a responsibility to not allow someone to walk out of the door of their premises after they've served them all evening long and watch them get behind the wheel of a car, knowing the person is drunk," said attorney Jay Ferguson.

Right now, state law only requires a bar to stop serving someone they know is drunk. Ferguson, though, argued that if an establishment creates a situation (such as a drunken customer), then it is the establishment's responsibility to protect the public.

If the state Supreme Court rules in Hall's favor, it could mean bars and restaurants would be legally obligated to take the keys from a drunken customer or make sure the customer physically gets in a cab to go home.

"I think the individual is responsible," bar owner Gene Devine said. "Those situations are tough."

DeVine said bartenders already cut off drunks and offer them coffee or a cab. He believes placing responsibility for what a person does when they leave is unfair.

"If you actually did that, you'd shrink the population of restaurants and bars, because they couldn't afford the insurance," DeVine said.

"This case is going to put every single bar on notice," Ferguson said. "When they create a hazardous situation, they've got to do something to protect the public."

The Supreme Court could decide the issue by the end of the year.

Chris Derrenbacher, one of the attorneys representing Torero's II, said he expects to file a brief with the state Supreme Court within 30 days.

RELATED TOPICS: Supreme Court, Durham County, Durham

e-mail print friendly

34 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 34 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
I am so tired of people blaming everyone else for their actions. I have never seen a bartender forcing drinks down anyone's throat. If you choose to sit in a bar and get drunk, that is your choice. If you refuse to take a cab home, whatever happens afterward is your fault and yours alone. Nobody else should be responsible for what you choose to do.

20 to 30 years ago we weren't such a "SUE" happy nation - What has happened to us? Everyone is out to make a quick penny wherever they think they can.

if this passes, then north carolina will have to revisit it's gun manufacturer protection laws. nc has laws that allow gun makers to not be held liable for what happens with the guns they make. so this gun law should set precedent.

also this could open up a lot of other issues for people to lay blame on others... mcdonalds should be sued because they sold me a double cheeseburger, my cholesterol raised, i have a heart attack, i die, and now they will need to pay my hospital bills and my family for the loss... chevrolet will be sued next because they sold me a truck... the list can just keep going. it all depends on how personally irresponsible as a culture we choose to go.

it isn't a republican thing or a democrat thing. it is an american thing, that we must start to change. we can not be a powerful contender in this global economy if businesses will not relocate or start up here, due to the large insurance cost of heavy government regulation.

When i worked fro one bar and had to deal with soemone intoxicated, we would tell them we could call a taxi or call the police....not that we could ever intercept all the at-risk drivers...but it was helpful

The responsibility should lie with the person drinking. Drinking and driving is their choice. The bars should not be responsibe for others actions. Just like Rev RB said. This responsibility thing has gotten way out of hand.

You are responsible for your own actions. Period.

View Comments VIEW ALL 34 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here