Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

3:49 a.m. • 2-11-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 52° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Judge Will Deny Resident's Call for Nifong's Removal


e-mail print friendly
Citizen Complaint Asks for Nifong Removal
Citizen Complaint Asks for Nifong Removal

For the second time in two months, a local resident has filed court papers seeking the removal of Durham County District Attorney Mike Nifong from office.

But a judge overseeing the case said he would again deny the motion.

Elizabeth Brewer filed a civil complaint against Nifong in February, alleging willful misconduct and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the office into disrepute. The charges stemmed from his handling of the investigation of sexual assault allegations against members of the Duke University lacrosse team.

Superior Court Judge Orlando Hudson delayed any action on the complaint until an ethics case filed by the North Carolina State Bar against Nifong for his handling of the Duke lacrosse case is completed.

Hudson told WRAL on Monday he would deny Brewer's motion again, because ruling on it would deny Nifong's right to due process before the State Bar.

Brewer filed a motion Monday to bolster her earlier complaint. The recent dismissal of all charges against the lacrosse players by Attorney General Roy Cooper and the State bar's denial of Nifong's effort to dismiss some of the charges against him support Brewer's allegations of misconduct, the motion states.

"By his own misconduct, Mr. Nifong's continuing in office as district attorney is an absolute impediment to the existence of a trustworthy criminal justice system in Durham County," the motion states.

The State Bar has alleged Nifong withheld exculpatory evidence from defense attorneys representing the lacrosse players and violated professional conduct rules by making misleading and inflammatory comments about the defendants.

Brewer's motion contends there is no reason to wait for the State Bar disciplinary hearing in the case, noting it has "a different purpose than judging whether Mr. Nifong should be removed from office."

"Mr. Nifong should be suspended immediately," the motion states. "This will permit him to concentrate on his own defense while permitting the citizens of Durham County to have a restored faith in their criminal justice system."

Equating Nifong with a "rogue prosecutor" who misused his authority, Cooper recently dropped kidnapping and sexual assault charges against Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and David Evans. Crystal Mangum had accused the three of attacking her at a March 2006 team party, where she was performing as a stripper.

Nifong stepped away from the case in January, saying the pending ethics complaints presented a conflict of interest for him.

RELATED TOPICS: Durham County, Durham, Duke University

e-mail print friendly

52 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 52 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
Durham . . . the road goes on forever and the party never ends. :-) an that's the way thangs go 'round here.

free speech on WRAL?????????what a crock of crap! NIF#@* is an IDIOT!

sean, the fact that "nothing that Nifong has been charged with in the civil complaint directly or indirectly affects Brewer" gives her complaint more merit; some one who is completely unbiased wants him removed from office so bad that shes willing to take any route possible to make it happen as soon as possible. i think judge orlando's delaying acting on this motion is not an action, by law he was required to act on this motion within 30 days and i don't think he has done so. he should have suspeneded nifong a month ago, if for no other reason, so he could prepare to defend him self properly for the bar hearing; this would have been acting on her motion and would be fair/just for all of us who live in durham and are at risk of being unjustly prosecuted by a 'rogue prosecutor'.

Maybe a judge, from another district, should rule on this. Judge Hudson and Mike Nifong have known each other for many years. Too close for comfort.

His career, (Nifong), is short lived. I know that, & he knows that.

View Comments VIEW ALL 52 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here