Smithfield, N.C. — With teachers in short supply, Johnston County—one of the state’s biggest systems—has struggled to attract and retain qualified teachers.
Now, however, school officials have a new, multimillion-dollar plan to attract more teachers into their classrooms.
At the Johnston County school administration building, a group of human resource officials meet each week to brainstorm plans for recruiting new teachers.
"We want to make sure that we are out front making sure that we get the best teacher in that classroom," says Joyce Wade, associate superintendent of human resources for Johnston County Schools.
Recruitment hasn't been easy. The teacher turnover rate is 16.6 percent in Johnston. Neighboring school systems like Wake County have lured teachers away with better pay. Officials say Wake County supplements teachers’ salaries by up to 13.5 percent, more than double what Johnston County offers over the state-funded base salary.
"It's all about providing a quality education while being competitive with other school systems," says Wade. School officials have a new plan that would allow them to offer up to a $4,000 signing bonus for new teachers. Right now, they pay between $1,000 and $2,500.
As part of the proposal, teachers who stick around would also receive up to an 11 percent supplement to their salaries compared with the 6.5 percent and 9.5 percent that Johnson adds now. School officials say the incentive plan will cost tax payers an estimated $2 million dollars.
"I think they deserve the extra incentive and the extra pay because they work hard for their money,” says Kirston Parrott, a mom whose son attends public school.
Parrott says she sees it as an investment. Scoring the best teachers means a win for her child and others.
The county commissioners must approve the incentive plan before it becomes a reality. It's scheduled for a vote May 15.



![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/share/2012/02/09/10711513/4f348e7981bb5-51x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/out_and_about/2012/02/04/10712136/pics_agunn53833-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2012/02/11/10719067/10719072-1329050037-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717011/10717011-1328936455-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717059/10717059-1328939591-100x75.jpg)






WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
March 24, 2007 1:48 a.m.
And I certainly hope they wouldn't base my job performance on my EOG scores every year. Some years might be good. But no matter how good of a teacher you are- you aren't going to reach every single kid. You just aren't. They aren't all coming to you with the same ability level. And they all aren't going to end up the same. When you get a student that doesn't know basic Math in six grade- you are not going to make that kid pass a 6th grade EOG by the end of the year. If I only had to teach my grade level material- it might be a possibility.
Please remember that no matter how good a teacher is, we still can't take the test for them. We can teach, guide, instruct, encourage, bed, plead......but the responsibility is still mainly theirs
March 24, 2007 1:47 a.m.
March 23, 2007 7:33 p.m.
March 23, 2007 5:39 p.m.
March 23, 2007 10:49 a.m.