Raleigh, N.C. — UnitedHealthcare and WakeMed want the public to understand that even though the hospital is no longer honoring the insurance, it will in case of an emergency.
Earlier this month, the two ended their relationship after a dispute over how much the carrier pays the hospital for services its member receives.
But a Wendell couple's misunderstanding of the agreement might have cost the man his life.
On March 3, Jackie Boykin rushed her husband of 46 years, Randell, to the hospital after he complained of chest pains. They bypassed the closer hospital, WakeMed.
"The main reason we went to Rex was because of the insurance," Boykin said.
Boykin collapsed in the parking lot of Rex Hospital and never regained consciousness. He died March 12.
The Boykins drove right by WakeMed not knowing that UnitedHealthcare and WakeMed had agreed that their members would be covered in an emergency.
"It's terrible, and it's tragic that people haven't got that message," said Deb Frieberg, chief operating officer of WakeMed.
Frieberg said the hospital and UnitedHealthcare have tried to get out that message.
"No matter what your insurance, they need to go the closest emergency department and trust that we will work out any concerns they have," she said.
For Boykin, the information comes too late, but she hopes others will learn from the situation.
"This might have saved my husband's life if we could have gone to Wake," she said. "We did what we thought we had to do."
UnitedHealthcare of North Carolian CEO Austin Pittman told WRAL in a statement Thursday that the company is very disturbed by the tragedy and reiterated that patients with UnitedHealthcare would be covered at any Triangle-area hospital for an emergency.
"In the event of an emergency, our members are to go to the nearest emergency room for care, regardless of whether the hospital is in network or no, the emergency services they receive will be covered at in-network benefit levels," he said.



![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/share/2012/02/09/10711513/4f348e7981bb5-51x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/out_and_about/2012/02/04/10712136/pics_agunn53833-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2012/02/11/10719067/10719072-1329050037-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717011/10717011-1328936455-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717059/10717059-1328939591-100x75.jpg)






WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
United Healthcare should have provided more information to its members so that this would be avoided. Contract disputes do happen, and who it really hurts is the patient. I understand why WakeMed would not bend to United -- United has too much to make up for since it gave its outgoing CEO a billion dollar golden parachute.
I hope that the Boykin family is able to seek restitution from United for not communicating to its members clearly. United has the burden of informing its members of changes in contracts, not the hospital, and from the previous posts, it sounds like WakeMed did what it could to contact past patients who had United Healthcare -- that is a good steward.
Again, my condolences to the Boykin family.
March 25, 2007 2:13 p.m.
Wakemed was honoring the contract it had in place with UHC. UHC chose to opt out of the contract....period. Let's just remember the facts here before throwing Wakemed under the bus with UHC. Wakemed chose not to be bullied and stuck by the contract signed by both parties, UHC tried to play hardball renegotiating a done deal and Wakemed called their bluff.
It's a shame that UHC subscribers are the ones taking it in the tail but perhaps do your research and check out UHC's history regarding customer service. A simple Google search regarding UHC will set you straight.
March 25, 2007 9:08 a.m.
March 24, 2007 4:50 p.m.
If you had to wait seven hours to be seen, how much of an emergency was it really?
March 24, 2007 9:06 a.m.
March 23, 2007 9:25 p.m.