Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

11:09 p.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Sat: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 52° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Debate continues over hog farms' impact on N.C. rivers


e-mail print friendly
Debate Continues over Hog Farming's Impact on N.C. Rivers
Debate Continues over Hog Farming's Impact on N.C. Rivers

North Carolina's $7 billion pork industry has to balance business against the environmental threat of large-scale hog farms. A non-profit group believes the scales are tipping toward disaster, and it is determined to prove the current waste-disposal system isn’t working.

Larry Baldwin, who keeps an eye on the lower Neuse River for the Neuse River Foundation, searches by air for farmers spraying hog waste near wetlands and drainage ditches. During half of his flights, he said, he sees potential violations that he said are slowly killing rivers and streams.

“Right now, we’re finding that farmers are spraying in areas where they shouldn’t be,” Baldwin said.

Photos snapped within the last few weeks show drainage flowing through fields into neighboring tributaries. Environmental watchdogs like Baldwin take pictures to refute what they see as public complacency about the threat of large-scale hog faming. The Neuse River Foundation wants the aerial documentation to push the public and political debate.

The General Assembly is considering a bill to extend the moratorium on new hog lagoons that is set to expire in August. The Neuse River Foundation opposes the moratorium, however, saying it's not working.

Officials with the foundation said lawmakers need to force the pork industry to institute cleaner forms of waste disposal.

Tommy Stevens of the North Carolina Pork Council didn’t defend overspraying, but his group opposes efforts to mandate a phase-out of the current hog waste disposal methods.

“There is simply not a viable technology for a grower to switch to, and very often instances like that have unintended consequences, such as putting hog producers out of business,” Stevens said.

However, Baldwin said the foundation will keep flying and sounding the alarm about hog farms down east.

“We're not playing about this,” Baldwin said. “This is not something we’re doing as a hobby. We’re serious about this.”

A spokesperson for the state Department of Agriculture & Consumer Affairs said inspectors will respond to public complaints about hog farms. Violations and fines are pending against one of the farms the foundation cited.

e-mail print friendly

9 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 9 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
True NCSU regarding good vs bad apples..and yes,that would be the downside of improvement..any cost would be passed down to the consumer...but stop..we don't want corporations to lose any profit. Nice thing is that supply and demand could turn against pork at that point and consumers could go to another food source...and then the corporations would switch gears but the local farmers of pork would S.O.L..I hear Alpaca meat is a good bet

Follow-up: Sar is right. Do not blame this on small, local "farmers". The blame is on the large hog processing facilities. We aren't protecting Mom and Pop down on the farm. The people profiting from lax oversight and a reluctant politicians are the some of the biggest corporations out there...with the deep pockets to resist change and fight additional constraints...if their profit slips, their stock slips, and their jobs are threatened. We can't have someone lose their job just because people in North Carolina can't drink from/swim in/fish in and eat fish from the Neuse River.

Most of you people just don't have a clue about what really happens on hog farms. Of course there are some bad apples in the bunch who don't do things the right way, but the majority of the NC hog farmers are trying to change their practices and do care about the environment. It is extremely costly however, so unless you're wanting to pay $10 a pound for your pork chops or your bacon then nothing can be done immediately... it takes time.

Rand321 - there are farms in NC who are currently testing some of these ideas

Nice try Sar. How many acres of non-permeable surfaces (asphalt and concrete)are there exactly in eastern North Carolina? Yes. Pigs are clean. Their excrement howver isn't when it's disposed in an improper/irresponsible manner. Take a trip to Boston and check the toxicity reports from the Charles River to get a better idea of what can happen to an environment invaded by chemical(yes, hog waste is a chemical) waste from industrial facilities(hog farming is a 7 Billion dollar "industry"), allowed to continue because they didn't want industry to suffer from silly constraints like the environment. They local government did nothing until the river esssentially died. You can honestly get a rash from swimming there still....after they "cleaned it up"

On the debate on the source of pollution issue- yeah, some of it comes from (hog) farms, but it is also undeniable that some of it also comes from municipal sewer/water system "spills" and from the large amounts of runoff from non-porous (concrete, asphalt) surfaces.

Don't blame it all on the farmers.

And pigs are actually relatively clean animals by the way.

View Comments VIEW ALL 9 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here