Local News

City of Durham Violated Water Reporting Standards

Posted March 9, 2007

Map Marker  Find News Near Me

— The City of Durham violated state reporting standards when it failed to report water test results from its two water plants in 2006, the city announced Friday.

All public water providers are required to conduct a test each year for VOCs or Volatile Organic Chemicals, which is then reported to the Department of the Environment and Natural Resources.

VOCs are a class of carbon chemicals that evaporate or vaporize and typically are found in water sources located near heavily developed areas. Because Durham’s water supply watersheds are not near heavily developed areas, the risk of exposure to VOCs is minimal, city officials said.

Tests conducted yearly since 1988 for the contaminants have consistently been below the maximum contaminant level, or non-detectable, according to the city.

Durham's Water Management Department recently conducted the test for 2007. The results show VOC levels consistent with tests conducted since 2004, meaning there were no violations of water quality standards, city officials said.

Those results have been forwarded to the state. The state requires that cities provide public notification of the 2006 violation within 12 months to customers. When Durham officials failed to do that, they received "Notices of Violation" from the state.

“Though the recent test shows low levels of VOCs consistent with past tests, I am disappointed that our staff missed this important deadline,” City Manager Patrick Baker said in a news release. “While staff did properly collect the 2006 sample, it was not tested and forwarded to the state in a timely manner. I have instructed the staff to conduct an extensive review of the current procedures to ensure that all state compliance deadlines are met in the future.”

5 Comments

Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Lawman428 Mar 11, 2007

    "Why don't we go back to the airport's original name (Durham-Raleigh) instead?"

    Answer: Because that name sucks.

  • Durham-Raleigh Mar 10, 2007

    Rand, keep in mind PR is exactly that -- PR. I'd love to see some things fixed in Durham government, too... and changes such as the very positive changes with the school board this year(after Durham voters together, white and black, tossed out on their ears resoundingly a very unfortunate choice.)

    When people ask me where I'm from, I'm proud to say Durham. Because I chose to live in a community that's diverse, with genuine charm and grit. Why would I want to live in a place like Cary, where everything's just shades of beige?

    Why don't we go back to the airport's original name (Durham-Raleigh) instead?

  • rand321 Mar 10, 2007

    Durham seems to have have a very hard time getting their act together. First it was the one city manager, then the botched police chief search, then Nifong, school problems and now the water testing.

    One might think the citizens of Durham would demand their elected officials figure out what is causing these and other goverance issues and sort through their problems. Public officials in Durham should deliver much better results and outcomes than they have been able to acheive thus far.

    Given all the bad PR Durham has received, its easier to just tell people from around the world you are from Raleigh (drop the Durham from RDU)

  • Low Voltage Mar 10, 2007

    No, Mike Nifong was in charge.

  • rand321 Mar 10, 2007

    was the head of the Durham utilities president of the water treatment association during this time? something does not smell right