Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

8:49 a.m. • 2-12-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Clear.
    • Hi: 41° F
  • Mon: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F
  • Tue: Rain.
    • Hi: 53° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Durham City Council Wants to Ban Smoking in Restaurants


e-mail print friendly
The Durham City Council next week will present lawmakers with a proposal to ban smoking in all restaurants in the Bull City.

The move comes after city leaders received dozens of complaints from residents.

"No one wants to walk out smelling like an ashtray and breathing in secondhand smoke, which we know how unhealthy it is," said Jayne Ardo, who favors smoke-free restaurants.

Currently, only state lawmakers regulate smoking bans in restaurants. The Legislature took that control away from local municipalities in 1993.

Rep. Paul Luebke, D-Durham, said some legislators bowed to the power of big tobacco.

"People were simply saying, 'Well, it may not be healthy, but tobacco pays the bills,'" Luebke said. "But tobacco doesn't pay that many bills anymore. We're going to end up looking more like the 49 other states."

Opinions on the proposal are mixed.

Restaurant owner Gene Devine said he does not mind his restaurant being smoke-free but worries about its effect on business.

"If you're going to do it across the board -- fine. But how do you enforce it when someone says they're going somewhere else, because they're not enforcing it, and I lose business."

Others think nonsmoking sections are enough for restaurants and bars.

"It's a bar. You should be able to smoke at a bar," said Jeff Kessler, who opposes smoke-free restaurants. "If people don't like it, they should just stop crying about it."

RELATED TOPICS: Durham

e-mail print friendly

11 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 11 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
dndunn, would it not be easier for the non-smoker to just go somewhere else? I mean after all, no one is stopping you from eating outside are they?

lrmerc5757, FINALLY, the first decent suggestion of the lot. This discussion went into much length yesterday on the state bill in office right now. No one even came close to a suggestion that compromises on both sides. I think that would actually put the power back in the hands of the people. Owners could decide if they wanted a smoking establishment or not and the patrons could decide if they wanted a smoking place or not. To me thats a win/win. But as usual, the non-smokers will have something to say about it. You will probably see all of the health-fanatics out there pushing for a total ban, infringing on my rights as they have so graciously done for a while now. Great suggestion and compromise lrmerc5757!!

Lulli and lrmerc, I feel bad for you that smoking is so important and has such a control that you think it would deter people if they could not smoke in a restaurant. If someone can't go more than an hour without a cigarette, then maybe they need impotus to stop. Lulli, if you want a cigarette after you eat, you can still go outside...you don't have to do it five feet from the person eating their food that doesn't want a cigarette. As a smoker, you do not want to be imposed upon by legislation...but how are the people in the non-smoking section supposed to feel when you light up a cigarette and they are in the middle of eating? Answer: They feel imposed upon. There is no perfect solution to who deserves more consideration, but it is easier for a smoker to take their cigarette outside than it is for a diner to take their dinner outside when a cigarette is lit near them.

The state can do whatever it wants to. If this passes, it will just give me the incentive to prepare and eat my meals at home. Businesses will lose revenue. I will not patronize a business that will not furnish me a little corner next to the bathroom to light up. After eating, the first thing smokers desire is a cigarette!

There are restaurants that are non smoking. There are restaurants that have smoking and non smoking and I have seen people that do not smoke set in the smoking sections and complain. Why not have restaurant thats has smoking only, so people that smoke can go out and have a meal without being treated like a outcast! People that smoke will continue to smoke and will not allow the state to tell them what to do. They will just eat at home.

View Comments VIEW ALL 11 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here