Bottle Deposit Bill Targets Money-Losing Litter
Raleigh, N.C. — A state senator on Tuesday introduced legislation to impose 10-cent deposits on the bottles and cans that now are tossed away as valueless and make up 60 percent of the trash along North Carolina highways.
It’s an effort, he said, to help turn an expense into a commodity with commercial value.
The state spends nearly $16 million on roadside clean-up. Sen. Doug Berger, D-Franklin County, thinks the deposit system would be a partial solution to that budget drain.
“Cans, bottles, plastics—instead of ending up on the roadside, they end up in the stream of commerce because it's profitable to pick-up those bottles,” Berger said. The deposits would be collected at designated redemption centers.
A manager from a local vending-machine company told WRAL he would anticipates a short-term decline in sales if the bill were to pass.
Berger said drink manufacturers already have contacted him, and he’s expecting an uphill battle in the Legislature.
It’s an effort, he said, to help turn an expense into a commodity with commercial value.
The state spends nearly $16 million on roadside clean-up. Sen. Doug Berger, D-Franklin County, thinks the deposit system would be a partial solution to that budget drain.
“Cans, bottles, plastics—instead of ending up on the roadside, they end up in the stream of commerce because it's profitable to pick-up those bottles,” Berger said. The deposits would be collected at designated redemption centers.
A manager from a local vending-machine company told WRAL he would anticipates a short-term decline in sales if the bill were to pass.
Berger said drink manufacturers already have contacted him, and he’s expecting an uphill battle in the Legislature.
- Reporter: Holly Harris
- Photographer: Edward Wilson
- Web Editor: Ron Gallagher
Copyright 2011 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
67 Comments
| MOST | Viewed | E-mailed | Discussed |
Most E-mailed Stories
Most E-mailed Videos | |||
Multimedia
Key dates in the investigation of Lance Armstrong on charges he used performance-enhancing drugs.
Key events in Iran's relations with the West.
An interactive look at the controversial decision and reversal of the Susan G. Komen Foundation to stop funding breast exams at Planned Parenthood.
Travel NC By Train: Click for Daily Schedules!
Bundle & Save! Get free delivery of a PODS® container - See how



![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/out_and_about/2012/02/04/10712136/pics_agunn53833-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717011/10717011-1328936455-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717059/10717059-1328939591-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717043/10717043-1328939633-100x75.jpg)






WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
It would also be an incentive to recycle, which would help save our landfills. Do you want a landfill near you? Recycling saves natural resources as well as landfill space. If folks don't want to recycle, it's going to cost them.
Bottle deposits have made a difference in other states and I believe it would make a difference in North Carolina. It sure would make picking up litter easier for me if I didn't have to pick up bottles and cans especially glass bottles which are really heavy.
Litter comes from several different sources. There is no one solution. We have to look at all the sources. Each source needs to be tackled separately.
February 21, 2007 11:26 p.m.
Yes, litter may be reduced, but by how much and at what actual cost? Think about it.
February 21, 2007 10:14 p.m.
February 21, 2007 6:02 p.m.
February 21, 2007 3:37 p.m.
February 21, 2007 2:55 p.m.