Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

2:16 a.m. • 2-11-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 52° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Nifong Foe Questions Judge's Delay


e-mail print friendly
Mike Nifong
Mike Nifong
A Durham resident who last week filed court papers seeking the removal of Durham County District Attorney Mike Nifong from office on Monday questioned a judge's decision to delay action on the issue.

Elizabeth Brewer filed a civil complaint against Nifong on Friday, alleging willful misconduct and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the office into disrepute. The charges stem from his handling of the investigation of rape allegations against members of the Duke University lacrosse team.

Senior Resident Superior Court Judge Orlando Hudson said the civil complaint mirrors ethics charges the North Carolina State Bar has filed against Nifong, and he issued an order Monday that would defer Brewer's complaint until after the State Bar hearing in the case is completed.

"Due process of law requires that the district attorney be allowed to defend himself before one tribunal at a time regarding the allegations," Hudson wrote in the ruling.

But Betty Tenn Lawrence, an Asheville lawyer representing Brewer, on Monday challenged Hudson's authority to postpone the removal proceeding. State law dictates that the judge act on a civil complaint within 30 days, Lawrence wrote in a letter to Hudson.

Hudson told WRAL that his decision to delay action on the complaint constitutes acting on it.

Brewer and her attorney could file a motion asking the state Court of Appeals to force Hudson to take some other action, but there was no word Monday on whether they planned to do so.

Reade Seligmann, 20, Collin Finnerty, 20, and David Evans, 23, have been indicted last spring on charges of first-degree sexual assault and first-degree kidnapping. A 28-year-old North Carolina Central University student told police she was assaulted by three lacrosse players while performing as a stripper at a March 13 team party at an off-campus house.

Nifong dropped rape charges against the three men in December after the accuser wavered in her account of key details in the case. He later asked to be removed from the case and had the state Attorney General's Office to appoint prosecutors to handle the case.

The State Bar has filed an ethics complaint against Nifong, alleging he withheld exculpatory evidence from defense attorneys representing the lacrosse players, misrepresenting the truth to the judge in the case and violated professional conduct rules by making misleading and inflammatory comments about the defendants.

Nifong's response to the complaint is due Feb. 23.

RELATED TOPICS: Durham County, Durham, Duke University, Lawrence Summers

e-mail print friendly

14 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 14 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
I'd like to take a little deeper look at this quote from Mister Nifong: "Obviously the person who filed this affidavit is someone who tried unsuccessfully to defeat me in the political process," Nifong said Friday. "Now that the voters have chosen someone other than who she wanted, she's trying to remove me from office in this manner."

First of all mister Nifong, she didn't want anyone specific in office, just someone other than you. Second, this comment seems a little smug for some one who didn't even claim 50% of the vote when he was running against "recall Nifong vote Cheek"(not even a person 39%) and a write in candidate(12%); and should have been running totally un-opposed.

Mister Nifong: Cut your losses and get out while you still have your license.

Judge Orlando: staying an affidavit is not taking action on it.

DA's are elected into office by the majority of voters... Easley appointed him because Nifong supposedly said he would not run for the office when the election rolled around, but... seems he lied to the governor; no one had to mark Nifong on the ballot. For all the folks who did not vote for him, they will still have to dig deep into their tax pocket to foot the bill. Future elections will not be wearing blinders, maybe.

orlando1160 - Only insofar as they follow the laws they are suppose to uphold, and only insofar as their court actions are concerned. He can still be sued in a civil trial, and sincerely, I hope he is. It may teach the few others who are partaking in shadiness to watch their step. God bless. Rev. RB

If you think Nifong is the only bad DA we have in this State ,how wrong we all are . I was reading in Asheville ,where their DA there is also dirty,maybe even worst than Nifong.Go read your selfs you can see how bad our Justice system is all over our great State.Come on Citizens its time we stand up, its up to us to make the changes.

All of taxpayers in N.C. will pay for Nifong's wrongdoing ,but Easley should have to answer to why he appointed him to office if he was not good enough for him to want him to run for a full term Smells:::::::And why did't Easley pull the plug before Nifong got in, Corrupt all the way around

View Comments VIEW ALL 14 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here