Local News

Even With Big Prizes, NC Lottery Sales Are Short of First-Year Target

Posted January 24, 2007

Map Marker  Find News Near Me
— Someone could have have bought a ticket in North Carolina with the winning numbers drawn Wednesday night for the estimated $254 million Powerball jackpot, but the state says that even a draw like that has not been enough for its Education Lottery to be as big a winner as officials had hoped.

Lottery officials say a big reason is tough advertising rules.

The winning numbers picked Wednesday night were 9 19 29 42 53 and 17 with the Power Play Number 3.

The Powerball jackpot drove up sales Wednesday, with North Carolina selling $4,000 worth of tickets every minute. Total sales for the lottery's first year are lower than expected, however.

When North Carolina started a lottery, the state’s goal was $1.2 billion in ticket sales for the first full year.

“We are not on track right now to hit that sales level,” lottery Director Tom Shaheen said Wednesday.

State lawmakers limited how much the lottery can spend on advertising, and what its ads say.

“Would more advertising help us? Sure. Would less restrictions help us? Sure,” Shaheen said. Nonetheless, he pronounces the program a success.

Sen. Tony Rand, D-Cumberland County, a lottery supporter agrees that education is winning.

“Cumberland County will get $7 million. I would like for it to be more, but I sure am glad we're getting $7 million,” Rand said.

Days like Wednesday help explain why lawmakers were concerned about having the lottery become too powerful a lure on people’s pocketbooks.

The jackpot brought Melissa Webman and Jennifer Butler into a lottery vendor. Scratch tickets kept them there.

“I think it's addicting, and sometimes you have to be careful. We've been here for 30 minutes,” Webman said.

Rand said lawmakers will meet with lottery officials in the near future to talk about possible changes, but he added that none is planned right now.
4 Comments

Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Durham-Raleigh Jan 25, 2007

    I look at this as proof that NC did not need an "education lottery" -- because, just maybe, NC residents are *smart enough* to realize what a waste of money (and what a social blight) lotteries are.

    I'm a card-carrying member of the Democratic Party in N.C. ... and I am ashamed at the stunts that Jazzy Jim Black tried to pull off in office, none less despicable than pushing the lottery through. I wish 7 more Char-Meck voters had gone to the poll to "throw the bum out," as the circa-1993 wingnuts would say, or that the party had had the chutzpah to push him out, publicly.

    PS -- Jim, if you want to help education in NC, how about helping history teachers, by releasing the "speakers' office history," eh?

  • Bob3425 Jan 25, 2007

    they're both right.

  • helock Jan 25, 2007

    I believe sales are down because there is so few winners. When you play you just giving and not recieving. I've played the games since they started and haven won a total of $60.00. They need to take some lessons from Virginia Lottery. I can and will start playing there games, because you do win something when you play.Truth to is NC Lottery sucks....

  • tell.the.truth.and.run Jan 25, 2007

    One big hinderance is the nearly cashless society their target market has become. I love scratch-offs, but have yet to buy any because I never carry cash and am not going to withdraw $20 and take a $4 ATM fee hit so I can buy a few tickets. Let us use our debit cards, and sales will rise.