Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

5:18 a.m. • 5-23-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 83° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 74° F
  • Sat: Clear.
    • Hi: 72° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2012-09-26 21:25:00
Updated: 2012-09-27 17:32:15

State: Human remains not evidence in Durham bones case


Michael Charles Dorman II
Michael Charles Dorman II
print friendly

An attorney for the state argued Thursday that human remains aren't evidence that need to be preserved for trial, so a murder charge should be reinstated against a Mebane man found carrying a woman's remains in his backpack.

Superior Court Judge Orlando Hudson dismissed the charge against Michael Dorman last year amid a simmering feud with then-District Attorney Tracey Cline. He ruled that Cline conspired with police and state agents to destroy key evidence – the remains of 31-year-old Lakiea Lacole Boxley – depriving Dorman of his right to a fair trial.

Boxley's family cremated her remains shortly after Dorman was indicted, a move that prevented the defense from conducting its own tests.

State attorneys appealed his decision, saying Hudson abused his discretion, and the North Carolina Court of Appeals heard arguments in the case Thursday.

"Evidence is generated from the remains. The body itself is not evidence," Special Deputy Attorney General Robert Montgomery said.

Appellate Judge Sam Ervin IV questioned that argument, saying that a body is needed to establish some facts in a criminal case.

"It seems to me that human remains have to be evidence in some form, in some cases at least," Ervin said.

Appellate Judge Robert N. Hunter Jr. noted that Dorman was initially charged with possession of human remains.

"Are you saying, under that charge, the remains would not be evidence?" Hunter asked.

Dorman, 34, was arrested in July 2010 after one of his friends told authorities that Dorman admitted to killing a prostitute and had asked him to help dispose of her remains, which he had in a backpack. An autopsy determined that Boxley, who had been missing since March 2008, might have been shot in the head.

Dorman told investigators that he only found the remains and planned to use them for his sexual gratification.

Allowing the remains to be cremated never gave Dorman the opportunity to back up that claim, his attorney, Ann Peterson, told the three-judge panel.

"If those are random bones, if those are bones of other people, we have absolutely no way of knowing because they're destroyed," Peterson argued.

She said she wasn't arguing that Boxley's family wasn't entitled to her remains; she only questions the timing of the release. The medical examiner held the remains for more than a month and then released them five days after Dorman's initial attorney filed a motion to preserve all evidence in the case, she said.

"The judge can infer some bad faith there," she said.

Montgomery said the medical examiner is required under state law to release remains to the next of kin after all needed tests are completed.

Despite the dismissal, Dorman remains in custody under a $150,000 bond until the appeal is resolved.


58 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 58 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
It is people like you that cause me to have no use whatever for the jury trial system. No twelve Yahoos are ever going to sit in judgment of me. piene2.....Still the bigot.

Dorman told investigators that he only found the remains and planned to use them for his sexual gratification........On this statement alone these legal fools ought to know this weirdo never needs to be let loose. Hudson is a nut, but this guy's certifiable! Look at him! There's a genetic war going on inside this...this...whatever it is.

ndadszucs- they didn't know at the time the evidence was destroyed that that would be the end result.

"This guy sounds sick whether he killed her or not. We should just get rid of these people, there is no helping them. wnt2rant"

Perhaps some day someone will say the same about you. After all, guilt or innocence means nothing, does it? It is people like you that cause me to have no use whatever for the jury trial system. My blood runs cold imagining one such as you serving on a jury. If, in my case, it ever came to a trial I would exercise my right to a bench trial. No twelve Yahoos are ever going to sit in judgment of me.

If you listen to the oral arguments and the responses by the judges you can clearly see that they are going to rule for the state. It was an erroneous decision made by a judge who constantly misinterprets the laws of this Great State. The defendant’s constitutional rights do not trump the quasi property rights of the victim’s family to possession of body remains. The defendant has the right to examine the medical report created by the ME. Cremation did not deprive the defendant of his ability to have experts examine the medical reports created by the ME and challenge the findings. We don’t bring dead bodies or bones into court to be admitted into evidence. The key point as pointed out by the court of appeals is that the defendant has to prove prejudice and one of the court of appeals judges called Hudson’s decision premature. Reversed and remanded is coming, to hold otherwise would establish a dangerous precedent that defies common sense.

View Comments VIEW ALL 58 COMMENTS