Durham, N.C. — Police investigators have been quiet about their investigation into the homicide of a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill student, but radio transmissions from Durham County's 911 indicate the 19-year-old was found in her bedroom and that there was blood.
The 5 ½-minute recording doesn't reveal anything else about the circumstances surrounding the death of Faith Danielle Hedgepeth, but it is new information in a case that has family members, neighbors and the community wanting answers.
Durham authorities were the first to respond to a call for help, but the case was turned over to Chapel Hill police.
They have only said that Hedgepeth's roommate found her dead around 11 a.m. on Sept. 7 in their apartment on Hawthorne on the View and that they don't believe her death was a random attack.
They have not publicly identified any suspects.
Other information in the case, including a cause of death and 911 recordings, have been sealed under a court order.
A reward of nearly $30,000 is being offered for information leading to an arrest in the case, and investigators are asking that anyone who thinks they might have information that could help to call the Chapel Hill Police Department at 919-614-6363 or Crime Stoppers at 919-942-7515.
Hedgepeth was a junior biology major from Warrenton who, friends have said, had talked about becoming a doctor or doing something to help others.
Friends and family are planning to start a scholarship in her memory that will help Native American students from small communities attend college.
Red Robin in Durham, where Hedgepeth worked, is holding a fundraiser Wednesday from 5 p.m. to 11 p.m. and is donating 15 percent of the proceeds to the scholarship.
Hedgepeth would have turned 20 on Wednesday.
"She just was a bubbly personality," her friend, Victoria Chavis, said Tuesday. "She had a smile that was just infectious, and she was a wonderful person to be around."



![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/national_world/national/2013/05/14/12445890/12446751-1368816960-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/2013/05/13/12441232/hahn-100x75.jpg)
![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/business/2013/05/06/12417151/2457a21a00d94324b6fc448c8ec173d0-Photo-1-100x70.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/28/12278304/LNL-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/04/12182235/12182236-1362457268-100x75.jpg)


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
September 25, 2012 7:59 p.m.
disgusted2010 September 25, 2012 5:12 p.m. Report abuse
What the public has the "right" to know is a complicated issue, indeed. Law enforcement must consider the integrity of their investigation and the media should ALWAYS consider the family. I am a news hound and want to know whatabout issues in my community, particularly relate to safety. However, from a painful personal experience, the media posted the address of a crime involving a family member and details about it before we were able to know what happened. No one else
September 25, 2012 6:22 p.m.
The public has no right to know. This is a fallacy put forth by the liberal media in their insatiable quest to entertain. Our media people do not care if they tip off murders, taint evidence or investigations, as long as they can print or broadcast their entertainment. I realize that what they do is supposedly protected by the first amendment, but the founding fathers would turn over in their graves if they could see how out of control the media is today.
September 25, 2012 5:12 p.m.
September 25, 2012 4:24 p.m.
I'm assuming that since the police said from the start that this was not a random act and the public is not in danger that they have a very good idea who the killer is. I'm also assuming the media was given permission to release this bit of info. Perhaps I'm giving both to much credit, though.
September 25, 2012 3:57 p.m.