Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

2:56 p.m. • 5-21-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Wed: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 84° F
  • Thu: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 80° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 76° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2004-12-20 10:47:00
Updated: 2004-12-20 10:47:00

Developers Claim Raleigh Tree Ordinance Too Complex


print friendly

The Raleigh City Council wants to stop clear-cutting. Leaders are trying to develop a new tree ordinance, but developers say it is too complex.

"The impact of our project will be $4 million. That's extremely significant for a deal we've invested a year in our time right now," developer John Myers said.

The ordinance would require 10 percent of trees be preserved on commercial property. Homeowners who live on more than two acres would have to keep 15 percent of trees.

Many people are concerned the new rules would infringe on private property rights.

"I tend to wonder if we are going further than we need to when things we have in place has worked well for many, many years," city councilman Philip Isley said. "Having said that, we all understand the risks of clear-cutting and how that harms the environment."

The tree ordinance will come up again Jan. 4. In other council business, the city is moving forward with $235 million in funding for the new convention center, hotel and parking deck. The funding model will be presented to the local government commission for approval.

  • Reporter: Melissa Buscher
  • Web Editor: Kamal Wallace

0 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments 0 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

View Comments 0 COMMENTS