Raleigh, N.C. — A bar manager and a Harvard graduate student began mediation Monday over claims that the student was thrown out of a downtown Raleigh bar because he is black.
Jonathan Wall, 21, filed a criminal complaint in June against Todd Chriscoe, accusing him of simple assault and ethnic intimidation.
Wall says he was with a friend at the Downtown Sports Bar and Grill in Raleigh on June 17 when Chriscoe told him that he would have to buy a drink or leave.
Wall says that when he told Chriscoe that he was waiting on his friend who was in the bathroom, Chriscoe grabbed his wrists, put them behind his neck and forced him out of the bar.
The bar’s owner and Chriscoe say race was not a factor and that Wall was thrown out of the club because he was not a member.
Although he didn't elaborate Monday, Chriscoe said videos from the bar's surveillance cameras show a different story.
Chriscoe has not been charged with any crime, and Raleigh police are not investigating the allegation since Wall filed his complaint with a magistrate and declined to file a police report after speaking with a police sergeant who was on foot in the area.
If the case cannot be mediated, it will go to trial Oct. 1.
"I'm hoping they can come to some understanding about what really happened and what the resolution should be," Chriscoe's attorney, Bill Young, said Monday.
Wall's story sparked a social media firestorm and prompted numerous other people who are black to come forward, saying they were also treated differently at the bar.
But other patrons have come to the defense of the bar, denying discrimination.
Accusations of discrimination, however, aren't new for Chriscoe.
In 2001, he co-owned a private club called The Office in downtown Raleigh. The club's strict dress code prohibited styles of clothing popular among black people.
A WRAL News investigation at the time found that a doorman treated a white couple and a black couple wearing the same brand of clothing differently.
Chriscoe said back then that the matter had nothing to do with race but had more to do with creating an upscale environment and ensuring that patrons of the club felt comfortable.



![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/politics/2007/02/06/1195254/1296152831-_NCCapitol_800x600-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/movies/2007/12/29/2229920/2229920-1208172047-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/2008/06/05/3000786/swimming_pool-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/goaskmom/2011/04/28/9516059/9516069-1304016629-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/house_and_home/2008/07/27/3287725/Blueberries-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments.
August 22, 2012 11:59 a.m.
Does someone need to tell that to the NAACP? :)
"So now it is clear that the bar's surveillance videos show that Mr. Wall is not telling the truth" - westernwake1
Can you post a link? I haven't seen the video.
August 22, 2012 9:56 a.m.
I had the same question. If there are no criminal charges, then why is there a trial date of Oct. 1? Seems more like a civil case to me.
Even if the black dude didn't leave when told, isn't it still assault if the white dude PHYSICALLY threw him out? I thought if someone is on your property and doesn't leave when told, you can't take the law into your own hands and remove them, but you have to call the police instead.
August 22, 2012 9:45 a.m.
Yeah, I'd say that sums it up. People can and do certainly discriminate based on membership, looks, color of shoes, etc. Want proof? Go to your next job interview in pajamas and see what happens.
The bar manager said he was kicked out for refusing to purchase anything and not being a member. In the first story, I recall he was given at least 2 or three chances and in once instance he said OK, but then admitted to pulling out his mobile phone and start texting.
The case is baseless.
August 21, 2012 7:14 p.m.
It means you criminal complaint has no legs to stand on and no truth in fact... you "mediate" so you can keep your face in press and help your future political career as an "activist".
August 21, 2012 7:00 p.m.