Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

1:39 p.m. • 6-19-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 85° F
  • Thu: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 85° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 85° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2012-08-09 17:20:00
Updated: 2012-08-09 18:56:15

Scientists try to drill through rhetoric in 'fracking' debate


Fracking
Fracking
print friendly

The legislative debate this year over natural gas drilling in North Carolina was often long on rhetoric but short on hard data, as both advocates and opponents claimed science was on their side.

Speaking at the Shale Gas Conference in Raleigh on Thursday, environmental geologist Rick Kolb said the truth is somewhere in the middle.

"Science has been politicized, which is sad, but it has happened," Kolb said. "Our goal was just to have a conference where we just talk about the issues and not say, 'We're for it. We're against it' (and) just say, 'Here are the issues to face.'"

Lawmakers passed legislation over Gov. Beverly Perdue's veto that would allow a controversial method of drilling known as hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking," as soon as late 2014.

Conference speakers cast doubts on claims from both sides of the fracking debate.

For example, opponents often say it consumes millions of gallons of groundwater per well.

Andrew Stone, director of the nonprofit American Ground Water Trust, said he's more concerned about how the water is disposed of than where it originates.

"The numbers sound big," Stone said, "but in comparison with all the other uses – watering golf courses and all the other reasons we need water – it's really a very tiny amount."

Advocates contend that fracking will bring an economic boom to North Carolina, but Kolb said that won't happen anytime soon. Gas deposits in North Carolina are much smaller than in other states, and they might not even be explored right away because the price of natural gas is so low.

"Three years ago, it was $10 for 1,000 cubic feet," he said. "Now, it's below $2, so you know, below $2, nothing's economic."

Legislative leaders were invited to the conference to speak and learn from the experts, but none accepted the invitation, Stone said.

He said it's inevitable for the nation to explore its shale gas resources, and it needs to be done properly.

"If we're going to do it, if North Carolina's going to do it, let's do it in a way that maximizes the energy benefit to the economy and minimizes, if not totally gets rid of, the risk to the environment," he said.

The conference, which continues Friday at the Doubletree by Hilton Brownstone Hotel on Hillsborough Street, is sponsored by the Carolinas Section of the Association of Environmental & Engineering Geologists and the American Ground Water Trust.


20 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 20 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
We're a Capitalistic Society, so deal with this Capitalistically. Place a Tariff on the products of these wells that will buy out anyone whose land is affected, as long as drilling is active. If you have fears about future problems, you then have the option presently to bail out. If you'd rather have rent and sit tight, so be it. Call it Voluntary Condemnation. Set the value based on Tax Value, with Revaluation available for the life of the wells on the property. The Property Owner then gets a Lump Sum, plus a potential Income Stream based on the Commerical Viability of the property's resources. The Property Owner can sell to whomever they wish. If a group is passionate about preserving the property, let them buy it. The Environmental Perception has been that it's the Small Guy v Big Industry, but it's really the end consumer v whomever is in opposition.

Cutting through all of the rhetoric about fracking, it is apparent that we will be relying on this technique to meet our country's energy needs for many years to come. But the industry and right wing politicians have not done themselves any favors by the way they've handled the debate. When the REPUBLICANS rushed this through the legislature and then appointed people on the oil and gas board that have OBVIOUS conflicts, all it does is increase the distrust from people who just want THE TRUTH.

Luvie?? Wow, I didn't expect that from you Drescher. Doesn't match the tone that you have been using in your comments. Then again...there is always a reason that people take personal stabs at other people and avoid debating the real issue at hand. They either know nothing of what they are attempting to debate or they have an anger problem.

Does it bother anyone that our elected officials were invited to attend but declined? Seems like a golden opportunity to hear the facts and make informed decisions on the myriad of issues around fracking. Pity they missed it.

Luvie, poor dear. It's only fair if you are pushing your agenda, right?

You are a tax paying citizen? Wow! I guess that does make you special. AND you love the sky. Everyone needs to stop what they are doing and start listening to you.

By the way, whatever happened to CoExist? Guess you'll have to take that bumper sticker off your CAR that runs on gasoline.

View Comments VIEW ALL 20 COMMENTS