Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

11:12 a.m. • 6-19-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 85° F
  • Thu: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 85° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 85° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2012-08-06 14:19:00
Updated: 2012-08-06 16:32:51

No contempt charge against ex-Edwards aide in sex tape dispute


Andrew Young leaving courthouse
Andrew Young leaving courthouse
print friendly

The Orange County district attorney said Monday that he won't pursue contempt of court charges against a former aide to two-time presidential candidate John Edwards.

Superior Court Judge Michael Morgan asked District Attorney Jim Woodall in June to investigate possible contempt charges against Andrew Young, his wife and the attorneys who defended him in a civil suit brought by Edwards' mistress, Rielle Hunter.

Hunter sued the Youngs two years ago, seeking to recover personal items she said they took from a house she was renting in Chatham County in 2007. The items included a purported sex video she recorded with Edwards during his 2008 presidential campaign and photographs of him with their daughter.

The two sides settled the lawsuit in February, and all copies of the sex tape were to be destroyed.

During the course of the suit, however, Hunter's attorneys alleged that the Youngs violated a state court order by turning some information over to federal prosecutors, including a deposition that Edwards made in the case.

Superior Court Judge Carl Fox had ordered that much of the evidence in the lawsuit to remain sealed.

The Youngs and their attorneys, Robert "Hoppy" Elliot and David Pishko, maintained that they were only complying with a federal subpoena in the criminal case against Edwards.

Morgan found there was probable cause that the Youngs and the two attorneys had violated a requirement in a state judge’s order calling on them to notify Hunter's attorneys within six days if anything had been released regarding the civil case.

Woodall said his investigation determined that Elliot and Pishko sought guidance from Fox when federal investigators asked for information.

"I’m very confident that the state would not have been able to prove this case, and frankly, I think this is a matter that needs to be put to rest," Woodall said. "The civil case has been settled, all the other matters to my knowledge have been settled, and I think the end needs to come to this. I don’t think there would be any state purpose served in pursing a prosecution.”

Sources have indicated that attorneys involved in the case were not to comment about it.

A federal jury acquitted Edwards in May of one charge of accepting illegal campaign contributions, and prosecutors dropped five other charges when jurors couldn't reach a verdict after nine days of deliberations.


16 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 16 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
Perhaps the "legal" definition of "contempt of court" is such that the case for neither the Young's nor anyone else is sufficiently strong to prosecute them... but it seems that in the "court of public opinion" ALL/EVERYONE involved in the Edwards case is GUILTY of being "CONTEMPTIBLE"!

Go away

A federal subpoena is always going to take precedence over the orders of a state superior court judge when they conflict. It is called the Supremacy Clause in the US Constitution. That is probably the real reason the state cannot bring charges.

Democrats trying democrats. Did you expect any different outcome?

Finally someone who has SENSE enough to put an end to this....IT IS ABOUT TIME...

View Comments VIEW ALL 16 COMMENTS