Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

8:22 p.m. • 5-21-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Wed: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 86° F
  • Thu: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 83° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 76° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2012-07-02 18:58:00
Updated: 2012-07-05 13:41:13

Driver's family wants answers in state trooper shooting


James Moore
James Moore
print friendly

The family of a Roanoke Rapids man shot to death by a North Carolina State Highway Patrol trooper over the weekend wants more answers about what led to the shooting.

The Highway Patrol says trooper Matt Pitman pulled over James Russell Moore, 64, Friday night on U.S. Highway 158 for suspicion of drunken driving.

Moore got out of the car with a loaded gun and pointed it at Pitman "in a threatening manner," they say. That’s when Pitman fired a shot, killing Moore.

But Moore's nephew, Brian Smith, insists his uncle never would have intentionally aimed a gun at a law enforcement officer.

The family wants to fight the perception that Moore was drunk and wielding a weapon when he died.

"It is the most devastating thing I've ever heard in my life," Smith said Monday on behalf of his family. "It's hard to believe because of who he was and how he's treated me and my whole family and all of his friends. It's just unfathomable that this could happen to this man."

Smith said Moore was a grandfather of two who was kind, well-respected in the community and had many friends, including police officers, two ex-girlfriends and his ex-wife. He said Moore didn't have a violent bone in his body.

"I totally do not believe it happened like that," he said. "The fact that (the Highway Patrol) is not coming to us and telling us anything leads me to believe that it can't be the way it was. He would not do that."

Pittman, 24, who was sworn in as a trooper in March 2011, has been placed on administrative leave while the State Bureau of Investigation reviews the matter, which is standard for officer-involved shootings.

Smith says he's not trying to place blame but wants to find out the truth.

"I don't want to tarnish (Pittman), because I don't know what happened. I do know what didn't happen," Smith said. "I don't know what he was thinking. I don't know if he overreacted. I don't know if he was malicious. I don't wish harm on him. I want justice."

Patrol spokesman 1st Sgt. Jeff Gordon said Pitman's cruiser was not equipped with a dashboard camera.

He said equipping each vehicle with a camera is an ongoing project because there are more than 2,000 troopers across the state and each camera costs $5,500.


101 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 101 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
"He said equipping each vehicle with a camera is an ongoing project because there are more than 2,000 troopers across the state and each camera costs $5,500"

If they had to do each car (2,000 x 5,500= $11 mil)but some cars have dash camera's, I am sure the state could have already had this done by now if they really wanted to....

That is fine though I see that people will justify anything an officer does even when it is clearly illegal. I'm not saying there was anything illegal about what happened in this case. Although, there is a reasonable suspicion and questions by people that knew this man. That there needs to be an investigation in any death and not here is the officers report and it is good enough because he says so.

Champ more hours doesn't mean better training or the proper training. Yes I have a very good idea because not only have I at one time was in the law enforcement realm my father still is for the past 30 years. Lack of training! Period

What could possibly have been wrong with my previous post?

You people are very annoying !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The vast majority of law enforcement I believe are worthy and honorable. Some are not. An investigation into this incident will help give an indication of whether this officer deserves to be counted amongst those honorable officers.

That seems fair and just to me. A thorough investigation by honorable investigators! With a lie detector test!

View Comments VIEW ALL 101 COMMENTS