Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

3:16 a.m. • 2-8-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Rain.
    • Hi: 53° F
  • Thu: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 52° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 58° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Ex-Lacrosse Player Sues Duke, Instructor Over Failing Grade


e-mail print friendly
Kyle Dowd
Kyle Dowd
A former Duke University lacrosse player sued the university and a former instructor Thursday, alleging that she unfairly gave him a failing grade because he was a member of the team.

Kyle Dowd graduated in May 2006, two months after a woman said she was raped at a lacrosse team party.

The allegations set off a tumultuous few weeks in Durham, with almost daily protests by people who criticized lacrosse team members for a pattern of rowdy behavior.

Dowd's lawsuit alleges that visiting professor Kim Curtis gave him an F in a politics and literature class that nearly prevented him from graduating, even though he had earned passing grades on his assignments to that point.

Dowd and his parents, Patricia and Benjamin Dowd, are asking for a total of $60,000 in punitive and compensatory damages.

"I wanted to prevent such occurrences from happening to another student at Duke," Kyle Dowd told WRAL Thursday night. "I didn't want to see another professor further their political agenda by maliciously hurting another student."

Curtis could not be reached for comment Thursday evening. A Duke University spokesman said he could not comment because he had not seen the lawsuit. Dowd's attorney, Joseph Zeszotarski of Raleigh, was unavailable for an interview Thursday evening.

According to the lawsuit, only one other person in the 40-student class, another lacrosse player, received an F.

"Defendant Curtis engaged in extreme outrageous and unethical conduct ... due to personal bias and prejudice," the lawsuit says.

According to the lawsuit, Curtis told Dowd he received a failing grade for participation because he had not attended class and because he made wrong statements in a paper without backing them up.

The lawsuit later says that the university told Dowd that Curtis gave him the F was because he had "confused the characters from the book which was the subject of the paper."

The lawsuit claims Dowd missed six out of 30 classes — one an excused absence for a lacrosse match and the other five resulting because of the criminal investigation involving the lacrosse team.

Each time, according to the lawsuit, Dowd had sent an e-mail to Curtis informing her about his absence.

The lawsuit also states that Curtis, a visiting assistant professor at the time who specialized in political theory and feminist theory, was listed in support of an advertisement in The Duke Chronicle, a campus paper, that sympathized with the alleged victim.

It also states that Curtis also sent an e-mail to students in her class letting them know that she was available to talk about "how this is affecting you, what we should do as a community, etc."

Dowd appealed the grade, and the university changed it to a D, citing a calculation error. He and his parents ask in the lawsuit for the grade to be changed to a "P" for passing.

Lacrosse players Collin Finnerty, Reade Seligmann and Dave Evans still face charges of sexual offense and kidnapping in the case. Rape charges were dropped last month after the accuser wavered in her account of key details in the case.

The next pretrial hearing is scheduled for Feb. 5.

RELATED TOPICS: Raleigh, Durham, Duke University

e-mail print friendly

25 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 25 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
piedmont1fa I find it very disturbing that someone with your clearly twisted dangerous christian dogma should be teaching any of our children the hate and revenge you espout in your response I belive in justice for all not just god fearing christians

sean_kelly15-

The instructor in question, Kim F. Curtis, was a visiting Associate Professor

The shooting was not near Duke, it was on property where NC Central students stay. NC Central has uppped security for this area. What has that got to do with Duke, except the lying stripper was a NC Central student? The person who drove a car into the group of Carolina students was a former Carolina student. What does his choice of college this have to do with his crime? It is the same logic. Should we stay away form Chapel Hill also? What about the school shooting in Washington state? Is the state of Washington to be condemned, too? With this logic, anytime a crime is committed, the entire city should be condemned.

The truth is, the lecturer screwed up. I am a teacher. My personal feelings NEVER enter into the grading of my students. Just the fact that the appeal was upheld means the lecturer did something wrong. Any inconsistancy on her part is unacceptable. Universities are not in the habit of undermining their instructors grades without good reason.

I dont' know what he earned, but they did change the grade. That says right there that the university agreed he passed the class. And to be completely honest - $60K is not a lot of money. To me it is! But that's what, half his tuition? Plus, he'll have to pay lawyers. And if he's going on to school somewhere else, then that F or D could actually really matter. It's not like he's asking for an A here, just a pass that won't affect GPA or look bad on his record.

I am so disgusted by the wannabe Rush Limbaughs on this board who have used the words "feminazi" and "nazi liberal" to seemingly add more power to their arguments. Associating the mass murder of more than 6 million Jews (and another 6 million gypsies, Russian prisoners of war, and others) with liberalism and feminism only shows your ignorance and discredits your argument all the more. It is alarming that such equal rights movements would be so threatening to the status quo that people jump to such grossly inappropriate misnomers in their discourse of them. I suppose that only reveals how well bigotry and ignorance have woven themselves into the fabric of daily life.

It is vital to the welfare of the community that this dialogue shift away from the name-calling and finger-pointing we have seen from both sides. Where do we get by calling each other "feminazis" and "spoiled rich frat brat[s]?" It only serves to exacerbate an already divisive issue we must face.

View Comments VIEW ALL 25 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here