Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

11:57 a.m. • 5-20-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 76° F
  • Tue: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 82° F
  • Wed: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 86° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2012-06-08 18:44:00
Updated: 2012-06-08 18:44:00

DA to decide whether ex-Edwards aide to face contempt charge


Andrew Young leaving courthouse
Andrew Young leaving courthouse
print friendly

The Orange County district attorney will decide whether to charge a former aide to two-time presidential candidate John Edwards with contempt of court.

Superior Court Judge Michael Morgan on Friday asked District Attorney Jim Woodall to investigate possible contempt charges against Andrew Young, his wife and the attorneys who defended him in a civil suit brought by Edwards' mistress, Rielle Hunter.

Hunter sued the Youngs two years ago, seeking to recover personal items she said they took from a house she was renting in Chatham County in 2007. The items included a purported sex video she recorded with Edwards during his 2008 presidential campaign and photographs of him with their daughter.

The two sides settled the lawsuit in February, and all copies of the sex tape were to be destroyed.

During the course of the suit, however, Hunter's attorneys alleged that the Youngs violated a state court order by turning some information over to federal prosecutors, including a deposition that Edwards made in the case.

A Superior Court judge had ordered that much of the evidence in the lawsuit to remain sealed.

The Youngs and their attorneys maintained that they were only complying with a federal subpoena in the criminal case against Edwards.

A jury last week acquitted Edwards of one charge of accepting illegal campaign contributions, and a federal judge declared a mistrial on five other charges because jurors couldn't reach a verdict after nine days of deliberations.


8 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 8 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
This shows how much power Edwards carries in the state judicial system. The same lawyers who brought these charges against the Youngs while representing Hunter switched to representing Edwards as soon as they settled the civil case. And they knew all of this confidential information. Smell a rat? The lawyers and the judges wasting time on this should be ashamed.

Thw way I see it is this if the Youngs were faithfully complying with a federal subpoena then the state really has no case but if the Youngs gave evidence that was ordered destroyed or sealed not on the subpoena or required by federal investigators then the state has a case.

thanks for explaining but I still don't care..Enough tax dollars have been wasted on John edwards or anything associated to that case.. let it go leave it be.. I guess some also figure if Eric holder can ignore congress then anyone can ignore anyone else...

One last thing it should be noted that if the federal investigators really did not need that evidence then that is for a United States judge to decide. In fact that is the second motion from the Edwards attorneys that according to the news that the US District Judge is considering. However, the Young's if faithfully complying with a federal subpoena were only doing what they were mandated to do by the federal subpoena. Lastly, I am neither for Edwards or the Young's as far as sides. I am not sure who to believe.

Sock it to them both.

View Comments VIEW ALL 8 COMMENTS