Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

3:29 a.m. • 6-19-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 85° F
  • Thu: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 85° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 85° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2012-03-26 18:07:00
Updated: 2012-03-26 18:26:17

Will politics of health care overhaul overshadow legal debate?


print friendly

Some area residents said Monday that they fear the partisan divide over the national health care reform law will overwhelm the debate before the U.S. Supreme Court over its legality.

As 26 states challenge the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the White House is highlighting the 2-year-old law's benefits. In North Carolina, for example, the law has allowed about 75,000 adults between the ages of 23 and 26 to remain on their parents' health insurance policies and has provided discounted prescription drugs to more than 100,000 Medicare recipients.

The law doesn't take full effect until 2014, when the so-called individual mandate kicks in. Under that provision, everyone must have health coverage by then or face a financial penalty.

Critics say the individual mandate is unconstitutional, but Gene Nichol, Boyd Tinsley Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, said the Republican-dominated Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, should uphold the law on legal grounds.

"There's nothing in the law of the Constitution, as it's presently pronounced or has been pronounced in the last 50 years, which makes this bill, particularly the mandate, unconstitutional," said Nichol, who participated in a panel discussion at Pullen Memorial Baptist Church in Raleigh about the law.

Still, he said, politics will likely play a role in the court's ruling, which isn't expected until June.

"It has played into the Roberts court decision-making process more aggressively with each year, so it's not sensible to think it won't play a role in this," he said.

Rob Lockwood, a spokesman for the North Carolina Republican Party, said he thinks the Supreme Court will leave politics out of it.

"I think the justices understand that this has to be a strictly legal ruling, that there cannot be any sway of politics, and I think they'll do a good job with that," Lockwood said.

Glenn and Peggy Eason, who attended the forum, said they support the reform law because the health care system needs to be fixed. They aren't as confident as Lockwood that the justices will weigh the case strictly on its legal merits.

"I think it is very much about politics. That's too bad," Glenn Eason said.

Thirteenth District Congressman Brad Miller said during the forum that health care reform could help motivate Democratic voters in the November election, but it will be just one issue among many in races.

Lockwood said candidates will address how to contain rising health care costs, regardless of what the court decides.

"As long as costs keep going up, it'll continue to be an issue," he said. "Consumers are looking for any way to reduce the costs, whether it be, like I said, free market on our side or more government involvement (on) their side," he said.


8 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 8 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
The mandate is not about the insured itself; it is about the rest of the society not having to pay for your bills if you get sick and ended up in a hospital. If you have problems understanding the concept, think that you have to pay car insurance if you have a car. It is not for your own benefit, but to protect others if you are at fault in an accident. It has nothing to do with "freedom of choice".

I've been in the healthcare business for over thirty years and one thing that hasn't changed and never will is the fact that some people will get better care than others. The system could not in any way provide the best care for everyone. The best takes money and it just isn't there. Health care is no different than a car. If you want a new one you have to make the payments and pay insurance. If you choose to spend your money on fancy cloths, cell phone, cable TV, alcohol etc, don't ask me or the taxpayers to pay for your health care.

Everyone needs to stop burying the real issue. How many do not have insurance but expect to receive healthcare when needed??? Those of us who are insured (even at ridiculous rates) cover the costs of the uninsured. The sad part of the health care reform is that employers are now reducing benefit coverage without reducing costs and the insurance companies are making record profits.

I luv the libs.....If the mandate stands.....its a good law.....but if it is trcuck down...its purely based on politics.....not the fact its a bad law.

Whatelseisnew wrote, "Folks, there is nothing wrong with the system itself. Health Care is readily available."

Health care is readily available at grossly inflated prices to people with good insurance or a small percentage of people who are insanely rich. Even with good insurance, many households are one major illness away from bankruptcy. Health care is already rationed by the insurance companies for those who are not extremely wealthy. The so called "death panels" that opponents of the mandate accused Obama of advocating are already standard practice in the insurance industry. Does the mandate solve the costs issues of the health care industry? No, but it is a step in the right direction for folks who would like to see a free market solution, rather than government provided health care.

View Comments VIEW ALL 8 COMMENTS