Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

6:12 p.m. • 6-19-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Thu: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 85° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 85° F
  • Sat: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 85° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2004-07-13 07:24:00
Updated: 2004-07-13 07:24:00

House Overrides Easley's Veto Of Billboard Bill


RAL-xgr
RAL-xgr
print friendly

State lawmakers make history Monday night, voting to override Gov. Mike Easley's veto of a controversial billboard bill.

The state House voted 79-34 to override the veto of

House Bill 429

, that would require local governments to pay billboard owners cash if ordered to remove a sign.

Three-fifths of the legislators present in each chamber have to agree to defeat the veto, something the General Assembly has never attempted.

The House needed at least 68 favorable votes from the 113 members voting Monday night to override the veto.

The measure states that governments without a compensation method already in place would have to pay billboard owners up to five times the sign's annual revenue before tearing it down.

Last week, Easley gave the thumbs-down to a bill, saying it was unfair to local governments and that he hoped to reach a compromise with lawmakers.

"I am disappointed that the House did not make an effort to reach a compromise," Easley said in a statement issued late Monday.

The bill now goes to the Senate, where it passed 34-11. Both the House and Senate approved the measure last month by wide margins.


0 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments 0 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

View Comments 0 COMMENTS