Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

3:42 p.m. • 5-25-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Sun: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 75° F
  • Mon: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 80° F
  • Tue: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 85° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2012-01-09 17:54:00
Updated: 2012-01-09 17:54:00

Durham DA again challenges judge


District Attorney Tracey Cline
District Attorney Tracey Cline
print friendly

In the latest move in an ongoing feud, Durham County District Attorney Tracey Cline filed a motion Monday requesting Superior Court Judge Orlando Hudson recuse himself from presiding over the case of Clint Edward Pollard. 

Cline said Hudson showed a pattern of not being impartial and using his power to "retaliate" against her.

The motion alleges similar accusations as one Cline filed in November where she asked that Hudson be barred from hearing criminal cases in Durham. She accused him of corruption and being biased against her, saying his decision to dismiss murder charges in two cases amounted to "raping" crime victims.

The motion followed Hudson's criticisms of Cline. He said she withheld evidence in one case and worked to destroy evidence in another.

Cline has filed a complaint with the state Judicial Standards Commission over Hudson's actions.


19 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 19 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
As a life-long resident of Durham, I can say that BOTH characters are an embarrassment to our city.

"Were the judges accusations against her (withheld evidence and destroyed evidence) proven??? If not, the DA has a legitimate charge against Judge Hudson."

Yes. They were proven. The N&O has been covering this extensively. Cline has railed on about how unfair the series is, but the paper has allowed her space to refute any of the claims and she hasn't been able to do it. All she does is claim that other people are out to get her and ignores the evidence they present.

"Were the judges accusations against her (withheld evidence and destroyed evidence) proven??? If not, the DA has a legitimate charge against Judge Hudson." - whatusay

Actually as outlined in the "Twisted Truth" series in the N&O; the withheld evidence and destroyed evidence was not only proven, but obvious. Even since the series was published Cline has continued to submit fabricated paperwork - including the demand for visitor / communication records of prisoners who challenged her rulings - with absolute fabrications written in the document on why the records were being demanded.

Can we just remove both of them and get on with punishing criminals?

Were the judges accusations against her (withheld evidence and destroyed evidence) proven??? If not, the DA has a legitimate charge against Judge Hudson.

View Comments VIEW ALL 19 COMMENTS