Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

3:47 a.m. • 5-23-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 83° F
  • Thu: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 86° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 89° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Peterson lawyer says judge should hear appeal


Michael and Kathleen Peterson
Michael and Kathleen Peterson
e-mail print friendly

The attorney for convicted killer Mike Peterson is opposed to an effort by Durham County District Attorney Tracey Cline to remove a Superior Court judge from Peterson's hearing for a new trial.

Cline filed a motion last Wednesday requesting that Judge Orlando Hudson not be allowed to preside over a Dec. 5 hearing as to whether Peterson, a novelist and former Durham mayoral candidate, should be granted a new trial.

Peterson, 68, was convicted in 2003 of first-degree murder in the Dec. 9, 2001, death of his wife, Kathleen. She was found dead in a pool of blood at the bottom of a staircase in the couple's upscale Durham home.

Cline has blamed Hudson publicly for two cases in which murder charges were dismissed, accused Hudson of corruption and bias and has asked the state Judicial Standards Commission to bar him from hearing criminal cases in the county.

Peterson's attorney, David Rudolf, said in his response to Cline's motion that Hudson is uniquely qualified to hear the appeal, noting that he presided over the nearly three-month trial eight years ago.

The request for a new trial involves claims that a former State Bureau of Investigation agent who testified at Peterson's original trial lied or misled jurors about blood evidence found in Peterson's home.

Hudson's familiarity with the testimony puts him in the best position to weigh whether the agent's previous testimony is valid, Rudolf argues in his response.

He also notes that neither Cline nor anyone in her office was involved in Peterson's conviction and that the issues raised in the request for a new trial don't involve her or the Durham County District Attorney's Office.

"The court has at no time displayed any bias or prejudice towards the state in this matter, and there is no factual or legal basis for the court to disqualify itself in this matter," he states in his response.

Hudson has asked Superior Court Judge Carl Fox, who is holding court in Durham County through the end of December, to handle Cline's motion, as well as similar motions in two other cases.

RELATED TOPICS: Durham County, State Bureau of Investigation, Durham


7 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 7 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
saturn5 -- he is a convicted killer however with all the SBI mishandling of cases, he deserve a hearing if the evidence indicates it; who knows he might have ben convicted in error.

He is still trying?!?

Let Hudson hear the appeal. It will show everyone what he is really made of.

If Cline had nothing to do with the case, why is she even worried about it? Unless she's afraid Hudson will throw out the charges and she doesn't want to be the one to retry the case.

The man is a murderer. Just accept it and get on with life. He is exactly where he belongs - well, he actually belongs in H E double hockey sticks, but that day is coming soon enough. NO APPEAL!!!

View Comments VIEW ALL 7 COMMENTS
Report It