Raleigh, N.C. — In a memo to the leaders of all departments Thursday, the North Carolina state budget director advised them to plan for spending reductions of up to 15 percent in the next budget cycle.
"I am requesting that each state agency develop 5%, 10% and 15% reduction options," Charles E. Perusse wrote.
Memo: Budget reduction options
The next state budget is due next summer for fiscal 2011-12, but Perusse asked the agency heads to have suggestions available by Oct. 29.
Gov. Beverly Perdue said she wants to focus on eliminating programs and services that are no longer effective, reducing layers of management and administration and consolidating where possible.
"We've been doing this for two years. We've been shedding services. I think the data is about a 12.5 percent reduction in state government and 2,500 positions," she said.
"Every single department has been instructed, and were instructed more than a year ago, to do an analysis of performance objectives and to have some measurements," Perdue continued. "I want to see some metrics on the value of the services we're providing. And those services that our tax dollars are paying for that provides less value to the people of this state are the ones we have to shed."
The final 2010-11state budget totaled about $19 billion, down about $800 million from the year before.
Losers included the Personal Care Services program, which saw $50 million cut from efforts to provide in-home aid to elderly and disabled people; and Perdue's attempt to introduce hand-held devices to help teachers in lower grades assess student performance, which received $10 million instead of the requested $39 million.










WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
September 6, 2010 6:48 p.m.
September 6, 2010 2:49 p.m.
here is a hint to these incompetant politicians...... this is describing what you do!
September 6, 2010 10:07 a.m.
Right. Sure. Haven't we heard this before? Yet how many of the 2500 already eliminated were middle management, and how many were rank-and-file workers? Talk about your metrics on performance...surely there are some metrics on this question, don't you think? So what are they? Dish.
What we've seen so far is probably a harbinger of what we'll see next. More of the same.
Let's face it. It rolls downhill. Top management are least likely to get the axe. Middle managers, who report to the top managers and are more likely personally known by them, are next least likely to get the axe. If someone has to go, it is usually the working stiffs on the bottom of the totem pole, who are least culturally "like" the folks in the top echelons and
September 6, 2010 8:46 a.m.
September 3, 2010 7:40 p.m.