Local Politics

Despite tight budget, Perdue wants to pay back teachers, state workers

Posted April 19, 2010
Updated April 20, 2010

— When Gov. Beverly Perdue unveils her budget proposal Tuesday morning, it will include millions of dollars in spending cuts, some new fees and more money for state workers and teachers, legislative sources told WRAL News.

Fiscal analysts project a $788 million deficit for the budget year that begins in July, and cuts will be used to erase most of that gap, said sources who have seen a draft of Perdue's proposed budget.

Watch Perdue unveil her budget proposal at 9:30 a.m. LIVE on WRAL.com.

"Everybody's going to be hit. Everybody has to, you know, suffer," said Rep. Mickey Michaux, D-Durham, senior chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.

State budget Proposed state budget to include cuts, new fees

State agencies were told in recent months to draw up spending plans that reflect 3, 5 and 7 percent reductions for the coming year.

A coalition of 100 state organizations sent a letter to Perdue and legislators Monday supporting a more balanced approach to budgeting and expressing opposition to a cuts-only approach.

Michaux said lawmakers will try to protect education and the Department of Health and Human Services from cuts as much as possible.

"We certainly don't want to do anymore on education than is necessary. We don't want to do any more on health and human services, particularly in mental health and personal care services," he said.

The governor also has proposed raising court fees to generate some additional revenue, sources said. No tax increases are included in the budget plan.

Last year, lawmakers approved about $1 billion in new taxes to close a $4.5 billion deficit, including raising the state sales tax and imposing higher taxes on alcohol and cigarettes.

Perdue's budget also includes money to repay state workers for furloughs ordered a year ago to save money in the 2008-09 fiscal year and to reinstate the step increase in teacher pay that was frozen last year to balance the 2009-10 budget, sources said.

Some cuts will free up money in the budget for those pay increases, while others could allow some state programs to expand.

Perdue's budget advisers say the goal is to be more efficient and to trim state government spending with minimal job losses. Vacant positions will be targeted in most cuts.

Michaux said he is confident the money is out there to accomplish that goal.

"I can tell you one agency right now that's sitting on a $20 million surplus. I can tell you another agency – and this is in education – that's sitting on roughly $200 million," he said, declining to be more specific.


This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • james27613 Apr 20, 2010

    All of us in my dept. did not take 10 hours of furlough,
    we're all salaried and put in over 50 hours a week,
    plus all of us still have the four weeks of 'vacation' that has no expiration date that we received instead of pay increases several years ago.

  • james27613 Apr 20, 2010

    Yes those of us who are state workers gave our govt an interest free loan.

    But we will not receive any pay increase for 2009 or 2010.

    Our health insurance has increased both years above any pay
    percentage we would have received.

  • nobama Apr 20, 2010

    They vote for you, you give them money when you get into office. This is why 4 out of 5 mistrust the government.

  • ncguy Apr 20, 2010

    Paying back? was that a loan from the teachers?

    I'm confused?

  • Even Apr 20, 2010

    I am glad that she want to pay back State teachers and employees ( they deserve it) but it leaves the question why not also pay back those taxpayers that paid the added "temporary" state income tax. I guess it must be an election year and you have to buy votes somewhere.

  • s.wake.co Apr 20, 2010


    You explained the situation very well, except it was 0.5%, not 0.05%.

  • wildcat Apr 20, 2010

    Sadly, such is no longer the case....

    It really is not needed here.

  • FE Apr 20, 2010

    'YOUR' is NOT the same as YOU'RE/YOU ARE. Please learn the difference people. I see this all the time.

    "Glad we have a professor of english on board"


    You do not need to have a professor of English present. The ability to know the difference between you're/your and loose/lose and their/there/they're once was common knowledge to anyone with a GRADE SCHOOL education.

    Sadly, such is no longer the case....


  • wildcat Apr 20, 2010

    YOU'RE/YOU ARE. Please

    Glad we have a professor of english on board. Thanks.

  • wildcat Apr 20, 2010

    No matter how you look at it; these people deserve the pay.