Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

8:34 a.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Rain.
    • Hi: 58° F
  • Sat: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 54° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Wake could restore abortion funding to insurance plans


e-mail print friendly
Wake County logo
Wake County logo

The Wake County Board of Commissioners could reverse a decision Monday that eliminated coverage of elective abortions from the health plan for county employees.

After learning that the state Supreme Court outlawed payment for the procedure by public entities in 1981, County Manager David Cooke signed an administrative order Feb. 10 to eliminate the coverage.

The county had apparently not noticed when its provider added the elective abortions coverage to the plans it provides in 1999.

Commissioners Chairman Tony Gurley said Sunday that he doesn’t believe taxpayers, who subsidize medical policy plans for government employees, should fund abortions.

"If the legislature wanted Wake County to cover abortion services, the legislature would give Wake County specific authority to do so, and the legislature has not done so,” Gurley said.

Commissioner Stan Norwalk doesn't think Cooke should have moved unilaterally. He said Sunday that the board should have voted on whether to drop the coverage.

"I don't want to be bullied into doing something that we wouldn't have otherwise done,” Norwalk said.

The Democrat also said fewer than 20 women have had county-funded abortions in the last five years.

"By in large, tax dollars aren't being used to pay for abortions,” Norwalk said.

Pro-choice supporters say female employees will suffer if elective abortions remain eliminated from county health coverage.

"County employees have the right to comprehensive health care. Abortion care is a part of a regular comprehensive health plan,” said Melissa Reed, vice president for public policy for Planned Parenthood Health Systems.

In the decision is not reversed, Wake County employees would still be reimbursed for abortions in cases of rape, incest or danger to the health of the mother.

RELATED TOPICS: Wake County, Supreme Court

e-mail print friendly

143 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 143 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
No one is saying that it is natural. The argument is that they are both elective procedures, so why should (following the logic of these arguments) taxpayers who disagree with either of them be forced to support them. Why shouldn't taxpayers who do not like children be able to equally dictate that their tax dollars not be spent on maternal care? You can't have it both ways.

"because one is natural and the other is not"

That is your opinion. As I said earlier, quite a lot of taxpayers do not like children, at all. Using the argument many seem so obsessed with here, why should their tax dollars be used to support moral choices which they disagree with?

It's not an opinion that abortion is not natural. It's a man made procedure.

Wake County needs to be competitive to attract talented employees.

Having insurance coverage that is less then what is available in the private sector will take Wake County off future applicants job search lists.

"So since the woman made the decision that caused her condition, she should be denied coverage? So all the people who develop lung cancer, emphysema, stomach cancer, cardiovascular disease, and cirrhosis should be denied medical coverage under their plans too huh? They chose to drink and smoke so now they just have to deal with it right?"

Pregnancy doesnt kill you. There is a differnce

"because one is natural and the other is not"

That is your opinion. As I said earlier, quite a lot of taxpayers do not like children, at all. Using the argument many seem so obsessed with here, why should their tax dollars be used to support moral choices which they disagree with?

View Comments VIEW ALL 143 COMMENTS

Multimedia

Click Here