Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

7:01 p.m. • 2-12-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Mon: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F
  • Tue: Rain.
    • Hi: 53° F
  • Wed: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 57° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Former prisoner's case changed N.C.'s death penalty law


e-mail print friendly
James Woodson
James Woodson

Twenty-seven convicted murderers and rapists in North Carolina prisons were scheduled to be released last month due to a State Court of Appeals ruling.

The decision set off a firestorm with Gov. Bev Perdue, who has vowed to keep the inmates behind bars until legal issues involving their release are resolved.

Some of those inmates have a chance at freedom, thanks to James Tyrone Woodson.

"It was my case in 1976 that overturned the death penalty in the state of North Carolina," Woodson said.

Now 58, Woodson was convicted in 1974 of first-degree murder in connection with the death of a convenience store clerk who was shot during a store robbery. Woodson, who claimed that his life would have been threatened if he did not join three others in the robbery, stayed in the car as a lookout.

At the time of his trial, state law automatically allowed for the death penalty for a first-degree murder conviction.

Claiming the automatic death sentence violates the Eighth Amendment - which prohibits excessive bail, excessive fines or cruel and unusual punishments - Woodson appealed his case. Two years later, in 1976, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed, struck down the law and spared Woodson's life and 120 other inmates.

Seventeen years after the ruling, Woodson was free. He admits adjusting to life outside of prison wasn't easy on him and his wife.

"I thought I was going home as a husband, but I actually went home as a son, because she had to help me readjust," he said.

WRAL News first met James Woodson 11 years ago when he was the kitchen manager at the Raleigh Rescue Mission. These days, he has a job in Raleigh and preaches to inmates at Wake Correctional Center.

He's also watching the latest court case involving the 27 inmates.

The lead plaintiff in the dispute, Bobby Bowden, is one of the inmates whose life was spared by the Supreme Court 1976 decision.

Now it's Bowden's case that might spare others.

"But for the governor not wanting these men released, I would like to know from her, 'Why?'" he said.

Woodson was in a work-release program prior to gaining his freedom in 1993. The concern about some of the 27 inmates is that they will be set free without being properly prepared. That angers and frightens some people.

"That's to be understood," Woodson said. "While I was in (prison), I met other men who are so evil that I said to them, 'They should never let you go. You don't want to change.’"

Since his release, Woodson has led a crime-free life.

"You have to want to change," he said. "Nobody can make you change."

He credits the change to God and to people in the prison system who have supported and believed in him.

"There's a choice in the matter in life itself," he said. "Do you want to live? Do you want to be helpful to another individual because you've been helped?"

"It was a good feeling (when I was released). I, James Tyrone Woodson, don't ever want to be in prison again," he said.

RELATED TOPICS: Supreme Court, Death Penalty, Raleigh, Beverly Perdue

e-mail print friendly

18 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 18 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
Mr Woodson could have driven off, left the other criminals, and notified the police. However, he chose to "participate" by waiting and "helping" the killers. He is as guilty as they are and should have paid the ultimate penalty. Rehabilitation should not be his reward when people are "killed" because of his actions.

Accessory to murder, or murder in the commission of another crime. As I've always understood it you can be considered just as guilty as the perpetrator who actually did the killing.

Tell how much he enjoys life to the family of his victim! affirmativediversity

Did you read the story??? He was in the car, he didn't have a victim...

Look at this another bleeding heart...murderer makes good...story on WRAL!

Tell how much he enjoys life to the family of his victim!

It did say he was in the car. Obviously we dont know the whole story. I remember a case in Greensboro where a young man was hanging with the wrong crowd and gave his friend a ride to the store to get some cigarettes. They ended up robbing and shooting someone while he was outside putting gas in his car. Not saying he should get off scott free, just trying to open your eyes to more than one possibility since we dont know the whole story with the facts provided. It's easy to come to a snap judgment, but what if that was your niece, nephew, brother, sister, etc. that happened to be in the car not knowing their passenger's intentions or what was going on inside the store until they pulled the trigger? What if when they get back in the car they hold the gun to his/her head and tell them to drive away? Would the decision be so easy then?

I would like to hear your thoughts. I know that this story goes against the statistics, I just want people to shy away from snap judgement.

View Comments VIEW ALL 18 COMMENTS

Multimedia

Click Here