Local Politics

Elections official: Easley hearing not a trial

Posted October 20, 2009

— Next week's State Board of Elections hearing into former Gov. Mike Easley's campaign finances may look like a trial, but officials insist the proceedings are only part of an investigation.

Easley seeks more options for budget cuts Defense attorneys dislike elections hearings format

Easley's travel on private planes and use of vehicles provided by auto dealers are expected to be addressed in the hearing, which will begin Monday and could last a week. The board is trying to determine if the value of the in-kind contributions violates state elections laws, which prohibit corporate donations and limit individual gifts to $4,000 per candidate in a single election cycle.

WRAL News will provide live coverage of the entire hearing, along with expert analysis, on WRAL.com, WRAL Mobile, over-the-air channel 50.3 and Time Warner Cable channel 252.

During the hearing, witnesses will be sworn in to testify, and some might exercise their constitutional right not to testify. The five-person board will serve as judge, jury and prosecutor, with members questioning witnesses, ruling on what evidence is admissible and determining whether any punishment should be doled out.

The board could take no action or could issue a reprimand or fine in the case. Its findings also could be turned over to the Wake County District Attorney's Office if board members suspect criminal activity.

Unlike a criminal trial, though, Easley and his attorneys won't have access to evidence the Board of Elections investigators have compiled or a list of potential witnesses, giving them little chance to prepare a defense.

Longtime defense attorney Joe Cheshire, who isn't involved in the Easley case, compares the hearing to an ambush. He said witnesses are easily painted as guilty in the public eye.

"I would not allow my client to participate in those particular hearings because I've never seen it benefit any person, innocent or guilty," Cheshire said. "There are no protections. There's no privacy."

Former state Agriculture Commissioner Meg Scott Phipps, House Speaker Jim Black and state Rep. Thomas Wright all were convicted of criminal offenses in recent years after undergoing an elections board hearing.

Gary Bartlett, the executive director of the elections board, said the hearings aren't designed to be trial courts. Rather, they are investigative in nature, he said.

"If you were to allow defense attorneys to be a part of the investigation, it would chill the investigation because there would not be a way to get to the facts," Bartlett said. "Our job is to find the truth and make it public."

Easley's campaign finances also are the subject of a federal grand jury investigation. In addition to his travel and use of vehicles, the grand jury is looking into his purchase of a waterfront lot in Carteret County at a below-market price, a high-paying job his wife landed at North Carolina State University, decisions by the state Division of Motor Vehicles that might have benefited a political contributor and the sale of a Southport marina to a group that included some political contributors.


This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • roho Oct 21, 2009

    In the meantime more and more tax dollars are being pi$#% away...either convict like you should or move on. Rediculous!!

  • OSX Oct 21, 2009

    Joe Cheshire compares this to an ambush. It shouldn't be if you don't have anything to hide. From Easley's past actions, it appears he has quite a bit to hide.

  • Space Mountain Oct 21, 2009

    It's not a trial, but it's pretty easy to see he did some corrupt things in office.

  • jaturtle2 Oct 21, 2009

    He should have to pay back every dollar that was spent taking his TRIPS everywhere. Now we are being taxed to death on every item partly because of excessive spending by the Easley's.

  • pbjbeach Oct 21, 2009

    I don't know about the election boards hearing process but i do know that the greivence process within the state of north carolina is nothing short of a kangroo court system for state employees an i supect that this is the same process for good old mikey & mary with the elections boards hearings i have always hear that what goes around comes around. i personaly feel like that this whole thing should be allowed to go to the us federal court system if the are indicted. if left up to the nc judical system the politics alone will set them free an they will never serve oneday of prison time thank you

  • Deacons Oct 21, 2009

    He is the most corrupt governor NC has ever had.

  • jrfergerson Oct 21, 2009

    q0..0 I totally agree with you - he will never go to trial due to the many many people in high places that all his dealings with would be exposed that the state would have to build a prison for if they were brought to the light. This man and his wife are have done really good on covering up themselves that they would probably get away murder even if you or I saw him commit it.

  • Dick Oct 20, 2009

    Heatherbrook, I'm w/ you:
    We deserve what we got.

  • Heatherbrook Oct 20, 2009

    First round toward clearing Easley

  • Dick Oct 20, 2009

    Whoa... Y'all...We're talking about the former governer. Remember, he's a capital "D". You KNOW we would have had action earlier, while that administration was still able to take advantage of us, if there was anythng to this.