Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

9:04 a.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Rain.
    • Hi: 58° F
  • Sat: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 54° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

State pension funds lost $4B in latest quarter


e-mail print friendly
State Treasurer Janet Cowell
State Treasurer Janet Cowell

State Treasurer Janet Cowell said Tuesday that North Carolina's public pension funds lost about $4.1 billion in the first three months of 2009.

The negative 6.4 percent return, which left the funds valued at $55.9 billion, was about average for pension funds during the quarter, Cowell said.

About 41 percent of the funds are invested in stocks, with another 47 percent in bonds, 6 percent in real estate and the remainder in other investments.

The funds lost $17 billion in value last year, and Cowell urged lawmakers to put $358 million into the system over the next two years to make up for the losses and for years of small state contributions.

The state contributed 8 to 10 percent of annual payroll to the retirement system in the 1980s and 1990s. In recent years, that contribution has been between nothing and 3 percent because investment gains covered the system's obligations.

A projected $3 billion budget deficit makes it unlikely lawmakers will put as much into the pension funds as Cowell suggests.

Still, she said, the funds have enough money to make payments to retired state workers and teachers.

“North Carolina has available capital and is well-positioned to take advantage of future investment opportunities,” Cowell said in a statement. “I strongly support legislation currently in the General Assembly that would help mitigate pension fund losses by providing the investment team with the flexibility and tools to increase portfolio returns and better manage risk.”

e-mail print friendly

8 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 8 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
Thanks, I hold them "forever" and will pass them on,when I pass on, so I always thought of it as a "paper loss" since I really did not loose anything, but a hypothetical loss as the value goes down and a hypothetical gain "paper gain" when they go up.

An example of a paper loss in the true sense of the word would be taking depreciation on real estate. You get a tax deduction for depreciation, but in fact, the property is APPREciating. In that example, the loss is on paper only.

The stock market has realized and unrealized losses. You cannot deduct a loss until and unless the stock is sold or declared worthless. The decline in value is very real. Hopefully the market will recover, but it certainly will not happen overnight.

Why are they real? If you sell, then you won't have as big a capital gains tax to pay and maybe even a loss, and if you don't sell them it doesn't matter. Curious, really.

"to increase portfolio returns and better manage risk.” Oh boy!! Absolutely give state government bureaucrats more control over the pension dollars. See where THAT get's us.

wa4mjf - you need to go back to school and take an economics course. "Paper losses" in the 2008 / 2009 stock market are very real. Paper losses don't necessarily turn into to real losses.

It is probably a paper loss, not a real loss. Folks say they lost a lot in the stock market, for example, what they mean is a paper loss. As long as the dividends come in, the value of the paper is no great concern.

View Comments VIEW ALL 8 COMMENTS

Multimedia

Click Here