Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

2:43 p.m. • 2-9-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Fri: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 58° F
  • Sat: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 52° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Supporters say bottle bill would bottle up litter


e-mail print friendly
Litter
Litter

One lawmaker is recycling an idea that the General Assembly tossed out two years ago: Require a deposit on drink bottles and cans in North Carolina.

Sen. Doug Berger, D-Franklin, says requiring customers to pay an extra 10 cents on each can and bottle could cut the amount of litter along state highways. The deposit would create an incentive for people to turn in the cans and bottles at designated collection sites to get money back.

Eleven states have so-called "bottle bills" in place. George Kiellwasser said the legislation has worked well in his native Michigan.

"When they put it in, it made just a huge difference along the highways," Kiellwasser said. "There's always somebody out there picking up bottles and cans and so forth."

James Jefferson, a Sanford truck driver, said a bottle bill in North Carolina could have a similar effect on area roads.

"That'll give kids some incentive to go out and pick up trash – pick up bottles and cans – because they know they're going to get a little money for it," Jefferson said.

North Carolina spends about $16 million a year cleaning roadsides, and officials said about half of the litter is cans and plastic and glass bottles.

Vending machine operator Chip Johnson said that if the bill were to become law, it would cut into his business by raising prices, however.

"When the prices go up, people don't drink as much," Johnson said, dismissing the notion that people could redeem their cans and bottles for a refund.

"In this hustle-and-bustle world we live in today, people don't have time to think about stuff like that," he said. "Basically, it's the government wanting to get more money out of everything."

Under the bill, any money not redeemed would be used to pay for the program and help fund other highway cleanup efforts.

e-mail print friendly

41 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 41 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
Sure you are - it is called a free market.

That's not what a free market is. In a free market, price fluctuates due to many different factors. Supply, demand, cost to make, deliver, package, sell the product, elasticity of demand, etc. Besides, as the current economic crisis has shown, pure free markets rarely work.

"You're not entitled to buy junk food at a particular price."

Sure you are - it is called a free market.

Some will pick the litter up and redeem the money, but the consumer is already paying $1.29 to $1.49 PLUS TAX for a 20 oz. soda at the gas stations.

So? Don't buy it. It's bad for you and the environment that we all have to share. You're not entitled to buy junk food at a particular price.

It seems to me this is a sneaky way to create revenue hidden in a GREEN IDEA.

It doesn't create revenue for anybody.

It is dangerous for anyone to be walking the sides of the roads much less doing it for dimes. People will be calling LEO to check out suspicious persons on the road and then while we are looking for bottle collectors who will be riding in the neighborhoods. More to think about then just saving a dime or litter be picked up.

OK, then. How do we get our cops to do their jobs and give people tickets for littering? They're clearly not doing it since the entire state is pretty much covered in trash. This has to be done because the police are not doing their jobs.

Are we not paying enough for goods and services in 2009 already. People will still litter. Some will pick the litter up and redeem the money, but the consumer is already paying $1.29 to $1.49 PLUS TAX for a 20 oz. soda at the gas stations. It seems to me this is a sneaky way to create revenue hidden in a GREEN IDEA. It is dangerous for anyone to be walking the sides of the roads much less doing it for dimes. People will be calling LEO to check out suspicious persons on the road and then while we are looking for bottle collectors who will be riding in the neighborhoods. More to think about then just saving a dime or litter be picked up.

"This is a terrible idea, it punishes those who follow rules and does nothing those who don't."

Wrong. The people who follow the rules get to live in a less-polluted environment and possibly make more money from picking up the idiots' trash.

"Want to clean up the litter? Actually PROSECUTE those who throw it out! Very simple idea."

So, are suggesting paying to put hundreds of thousands of government employees to stand along the sides of roads, or do you propose setting up hundreds of thousands of video cameras to watch people? How do you propose to enforce this, exactly?

View Comments VIEW ALL 41 COMMENTS

Multimedia

Click Here