Raleigh, N.C. — A panel reviewing policies concerning state employees and their e-mail planned to meet Friday.
North Carolina Gov. Mike Easley appointed the panel after a fired employee claimed Easley's administration had an unofficial policy of deleting e-mail communications daily.
In a meeting earlier this month, panel members heard from media representatives who said they want every state e-mail saved. That debate has moved from the meeting room to the courtroom.
State Auditor Leslie Merritt said in a letter that the e-mail Records Review Panel should take the Office of the State Auditor’s mission into consideration while reviewing the state’s e-mail retention policies.
“For the Office of the State Auditor, e-mails serve as information in the audit trail,” Merritt said. “They tend to confirm the occurrence of actual events and provide a unique window into the operation of state government.”
Whether state business or spam, employees decide what e-mails to delete from their computers.
Leaders of media organizations in North Carolina say every e-mail should be saved because the messages could be important public records in the future.
“Any policy that allows destruction of e-mail is in blatant violation of our state’s Open Records Law,” said Rick Thames, editor of The Charlotte Observer, one of the media outlets that have sued Easley to get a court order to save e-mail. The News & Observer and The Associated Press are also plaintiffs in the case.
That's the case being made to the panel Easley convened to reviewing the state's e-mail retention policies. Accusations that state workers were told to delete e-mails from the governor's office were the spark for the controversy.
The executive branch receives nearly 900,000 e-mails every day. Easley and others have argued that keeping all of them would take up too much disk space and cost too much money.
“Cost and inconvenience cannot be a factor. A public record must be preserved. Period,” Thames said.
One newspaper editor estimated that e-mail archive system for the state could cost from $120,000 to $3 million.











WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments.
April 18, 2008 2:01 p.m.
How do these organizations comply with the stringent email retention rules imposed by the SEC and the Federal government? They use commercial software that takes the burden off of the end user by using a pre-determined set of rules based upon current regulations. The market has seen a demand and filled this void. One program that comes to mind is “Assentor”. The state, if serious, about complying with the letter of the law on email retention would at least entertain using software and relieving the state employees of vetting hundreds of emails.
April 18, 2008 1:03 p.m.
April 18, 2008 12:21 p.m.
April 18, 2008 11:59 a.m.
April 18, 2008 11:37 a.m.