Hillsborough, N.C. — Realtors and others are balking at Orange County's decision to spend $100,000 to educate voters about land-transfer taxes before the May 6 primary, when county residents will be asked to approve the tax.
The transfer tax was one of two options that state lawmakers approved last year to give counties some choices in generating revenue to deal with growth-related needs, such as new schools, wider roads or more water and sewer lines. The tax would charge home-sellers 0.4 percent of the sales price.
Orange County commissioners said homeowners must pick from a transfer tax or higher property taxes to fund new schools and parks.
"Either you pay us now, or you pay us later," said Barry Jacobs, chairman of the Orange County Board of Commissioners.
The media campaign would be heavily scrutinized to ensure it doesn't cross the boundary from providing information to advocating approval of the tax, Jacobs said.
"I'm going to move to the edge very carefully. I don't want to fall over the edge," he said. "I think it's important that we be dispassionate reporters of fact to our voters."
Jacobs said the campaign is needed to combat a well-funded real estate lobby intent on killing the tax.
Last fall, transfer tax proposals failed in all 16 counties that voted on them. Ashe, Gates and Polk counties also have the tax on their ballots in May.
When Wake County put school and open space bonds on the ballot, the campaigns for and against them were led by private citizens and private dollars. Aside from some brochures, commissioners kept taxpayer money out of the fight.
"If there's any element that might be advocacy, we step away from it," said Joe Bryan, chairman of the Wake County Board of Commissioners.
Mark Zimmerman, a real estate agent in Chapel Hill, said he wishes Orange County officials would do likewise.
"A lot of people are very, very upset that $100,000 of our tax dollars are going to be used in a campaign to try to get people to accept another tax," Zimmerman said. "I don't understand why it has to take $100,000 to do that."



![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/national_world/national/2013/05/14/12445890/12446751-1368816960-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/2013/05/13/12441232/hahn-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/28/12278304/LNL-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/04/12182235/12182236-1362457268-100x75.jpg)



WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments.
It is my sincere hope that the voters will remove this person from the OCCC. I am seeing this kind of attitude coming more and more from people holding office. Somehow they arrive at an attitude that however much money they want; they will take one way or another. I hear almost no one in public office promoting cutting spending. The long term affect of this is that, when you reach a certain taxation threshold business will start leaving. Then the people follow and those that stay are left with an eroding tax base and a group of elected idiots crying about they still need to pay for everything. We need to turn out just about every incumbent at all levels of Government in North Carolina this year.
March 26, 2008 12:52 p.m.
When Raleigh bragged about being able to make 8-10 million by raising the impact fee to $2,500 per home, it will take 3,200 new homes being built just to make the 8 million. At least with the transer fee, all buyers will pay into it.
March 26, 2008 11:26 a.m.
March 26, 2008 8:14 a.m.
March 26, 2008 8:09 a.m.
March 26, 2008 7:17 a.m.