Raleigh, N.C. — State lawmakers are considering a proposal that would require homeowners and businesses that use private wells to report on how much water they consume.
A special legislative committee is expected to present a list of ideas to Gov. Mike Easley, who could push for drought legislation on various fronts during the General Assembly's short session, which begins in May.
About 40 percent of North Carolina residents use private wells, and their water use is an unknown variable for state officials trying to develop accurate models to manage water resources during the ongoing drought.
State Rep. Bill Faison, D-Orange, said lawmakers are considering fining well owners if they don't report their water usage. But he said he recognizes that calculating that consumption might be hard for many people, noting he had three wells on his Orange County farm.
"Everyone wants to do their part for water conservation, but I don't have any idea what the water consumption rate is in our home," Faison said.
Grady Poole's family has dug wells for decades, and he said many of his customers put wells in specifically to keep the government out of their lives.
"They want to rely only on themselves and not have to depend on government to take care of them," Poole said. "If you have a private well, you should be able to use it at your discretion – when you want it, how you want it."
But Georgiann Fonte, who gets her water through Raleigh's municipal system and has had to curb her gardening because of tight water restrictions, said regulating well users is a matter of fairness.
"All of us have to conserve. If we don't, we may not have drinking water or bathing water," Fonte said. "I would think they'd want to conserve just for the fact they won't want their wells to run dry."












WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments.
February 29, 2008 7:19 a.m.
Of course your flowers and grass are dead; It's frekin' February.
February 28, 2008 10:13 a.m.
My post was referring to such comments as:
"Unlike city dwellers who have got to have that green grass. I have to pick and choose what we wash as far as clothing, and how often I wash. We know how to conserve, unlike city dwellers."
Us city swellers are not outside splashing around in our pools, with sparkling clean cars and pretty flowers. As I said, my grass and my plants are dead, as are my neighbors' and our cars are filthy unless we take them to an allowable car wash. We know perfectly well how to conserve water and are doing so.
February 28, 2008 9:07 a.m.
Fact: 'Real' well users (those of us beyond the municipal pipes) conserve. We have to. We always have. Irrigating a lawn is something I would never consider. Fact: Volume alone means little. My 310' well draws water from one supply, my neighbor's 60' well from another. Fact: We are not draining the lakes. Especially those of us with deep wells. Not a credible claim.
Not-Fact: Despite all of this, it's 'just not fair' that I am not under municipal restrictions. Guess what? I could feel it's 'just not fair' that the municipal customers have water when I lose power or have a pump fail. Poor me. My local muni owes me a pipeline or a tanker truck. NOT!
A little understanding BEFORE trotting out random ideas to appeal to voters is responsible politics - oh wait...
February 27, 2008 5:42 p.m.
This discussion stems from the fact that City users are upset b/c they are having to conserve, yet they see well users not being "restricted" equally. The reason that well users are not facing the same restrictions is b/c, for the most part, they conserve all the time, drought or not. Also, the water they bring up from the ground gets recycled back into that same ground, therefore it is recycled and not consumed.
This is not the case for City water customers. The water consumed is NOT recycled back to it's original location. THAT is why Falls Lake is down.
It's not a 'high horse' that well users are on. Well users know that when the well runs dry, it's THEIR responsibility. It's those who think b/c THEY are being restricted for their choices, then EVERYone should be equally restricted, regardless of logic. They are on a high horse.
February 27, 2008 5:40 p.m.