Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

12:00 p.m. • 2-11-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 41° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Voters Reject Transfer, Sales Taxes


e-mail print friendly
Transfer tax opposition sign
Transfer tax opposition sign

Growth-related taxes were soundly rejected Tuesday by voters in most area counties.

State lawmakers approved giving counties the option of imposing a new tax to address needs like more classroom space, improved roads or new water and sewer lines to accommodate growing populations.

Counties could impose a land transfer tax equal to 0.4 percent of the sale price whenever property changes hands or a 0.25-cent local sales tax, provided voters approved the measures.

Officials said the new taxes were needed to give them an option other than property tax increases to raise the revenue needed to expand infrastructure as more families moved in.

But voters didn't agree and turned down the referenda by wide margins, in most cases.

In the closest votes, Cumberland County voters defeated a local sales tax by 52 to 48 percent, and Robeson County voters turned down the sales tax proposal by a 58 to 42 percent margin.

Meanwhile, the transfer tax was defeated 93-7 percent in Harnett County, 85-15 percent in Hoke County, 84-16 percent in Johnston County, 77-23 percent in Moore County and 70-30 percent in Chatham County.

"I think this sends a very strong message that the public feels this isn't a fair means of taxation," said Tim Kent, executive vice president of the North Carolina Association of Realtors. "(This is) clearly a victory for homeowners and housing affordability in this state."

Voters in Johnston and Harnett counties also defeated sales tax proposals by more than four-to-one margins.

Sampson County was the only area county to approve a tax Tuesday, as more than 77 percent of voters passed a local sales tax.

Realtors and home builders waged a fierce advertising and lobbying campaign against the transfer tax in the General Assembly, saying it would drive up home prices. Lower-key efforts targeted counties putting the question on the ballot this fall.

The local sales tax proposal didn't generate nearly as much heat, either in the General Assembly or in area counties.

Kent said he hopes the results make other counties think twice about placing a transfer tax on the ballot in the future, especially with the slowdown in the housing market.

"The timing is horrendous right now to be placing another tax on home ownership," he said.

But Wake Up Wake County, a group that advocates for better growth management, said a transfer tax would raise about $50 million a year to help the county address needs brought on by booming growth. The group plans to lobby community organizations in the coming months to support a transfer tax in Wake County next year.

"It helps growth pay for growth," said Stan Norwalk, vice chairman of the group.

RELATED TOPICS: Chatham County, Sampson County, Moore County, Johnston County, Robeson County, Harnett County, Hoke County, Wake County, Cumberland County

e-mail print friendly

19 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 19 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
When is the vote to repeal the property tax? Why should property oweners pay for anything? If kids want an edcuation or health care, they should get a job or "earn" it by having rich parents. Let them pull themselves up by their size 2 bootstraps! Roads like 540 should be granted by the road fairy and fixed by the road repair trolls who come out at night! No tolls or gas taxes!

In reality, impact fees can only cover about half of certain costs -- roads, etc. When a new house/townhouse/apartment/condo is built, the other costs associated with that impact is *not* covered by the impact fee. Growth does *not* pay for itself. The existing population pays.

Now, instead of the home *buyer* paying the transfer tax, home *owners* will be taxed more to provide for all the things (roads, sewer, water, fire, police, etc.) the development/home builder/realtor lobby refuses to pay for with the profits they make per house.

Boy did the real estate lobbyists pull the wool over the voters eyes on this one! And how can so many bonds pass? I belive strongly those voting for the bonds are the ones hit least by the increase in taxes to cover them. Geez - the street and sidewalk beautification bond passes? Gotta keep them crack houses looking good!

Crazy - people will get in line to give away other peoples money!

Everyone says they need more money because of growth.. Let's see, usually more people living somewhere means more people paying taxes.. EXCEPT when most of the new people are illegal aliens who don't own property and have 8 kids.. They use more resources and pay very little or NO taxes. They rent so they pay no property taxes.. Before long, counties have no money to build schools and pay for resources needed by the population growth. We are giving away our country to a bunch of people who are not even citizens.. Saying I told you so isn't going to be comforting to me when I'm old!

The problem is not developers, or newcomers or Fortune Magazine or even two headed, alien space invaders from the evil planet Selexia 9.3!

The problem is the morons we vote into office wasting time and money on stupidity. Art, music museums, new trees along the Beltline, greenways with jogging paths, etc are all great things to have. But not at the expense of schools, roads, cops and firemen.

When we, the taxpayers, budget for our homes, we cover necessities first. When the tax (ab)users get the tax dollars, they try to cover a percentage of everything, and that leaves everything short of funds. If you want to jog, go jog on the existing sidewalk, or at the existing high school track. Don't petition the city council for a new, tranquil, greenway, at the cost expense of no new schools, no more cops and better equipped firemen.

Grow up, everybody can't get what they want!

As far as job growth goes, we already have enough jobs here. We have enough people, Wal-Marts, malls, grocery stores, and restaurants. Isn't the whole reason for job growth is to bring more people to the area to support business? Well, if we already have enough people and enough businesses to enjoy things, then why do we need more jobs to bring more people here? It's starting to actually do the opposite and make things worse here and suck the life out of the area.

View Comments VIEW ALL 19 COMMENTS

Multimedia

Click Here