Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

8:47 a.m. • 2-11-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 41° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Transfer, Sales Tax Votes on Area Ballots


e-mail print friendly
Transfer, Sales Tax Votes on Area Ballots
Transfer tax opposition sign

Voters in several area counties will face the question of approving new taxes in next week's election.

In the new state budget, state lawmakers approved giving counties the option of imposing a new tax to address growth-related needs, such as more classroom space, improved roads or new water and sewer lines.

Chatham, Hoke and Moore counties are among 11 North Carolina counties asking voters whether to impose a land transfer tax equal to 0.4 percent of the sale price whenever property changes hands. Meanwhile, Cumberland, Robeson and Sampson counties are among 11 counties holding a referendum on whether to adopt a 0.25-cent local sales tax.

Harnett and Johnston counties are among five counties offering voters a choice between the land-transfer and local sales tax. If both initiatives are approved, county officials could impose only one.

Chatham County resident Ed Weintraub said he thinks a land transfer tax unfairly targets homeowners.

"I think it's a bad idea. It gives the county a permanent lien on your property," Weintraub said. "Why not target people who wear blue suits and have 401(k)s at (Research Triangle Park)? It's not fair."

But county officials point to projections of 15,000 new homes over the next decade, requiring six to eight new schools at a cost of about $350 million. They said the only other option for dealing with growth would be to raise property taxes.

"We think this is a much fairer tax," Commissioner George Lucier said.

A land transfer tax would generate about $2.5 million a year in Chatham County, officials said.

"The land transfer tax wouldn't be a do-all, fix-all, but it will pay the debt service on one school," Commissioner Mike Cross said.

Realtors and home builders waged a fierce advertising and lobbying campaign against the transfer tax in the General Assembly, saying it would drive up home prices. Lower-key efforts have targeted counties putting the question on the ballot this fall.

"What is 0.4 percent of $100,000? It's $400. If $400 is going to stop you from buying a house, you don't need to buy a house," Commissioner Patrick Barnes said.

Chatham County officials said they expect a close vote next Tuesday, but if the transfer tax fails, they vowed to continue putting it on the ballot until it passes.

Although Durham County voters won't vote on a transfer or sales tax, they will have bond packages on the ballot. City leaders want $20 million to improve sidewalks, while countywide bond issues include $194 million school renovations and other proposals for museum and community college improvements.

RELATED TOPICS: Chatham County, Durham County, Research Triangle, Durham, Cumberland County

e-mail print friendly

29 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 29 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
Nancy, I'm with you! An impact fee is precisely the best way to pay for growth. You want a new home? Fine, you can contribute the new roads, schools, etc... It is totally unfair to tax the transfer of an existing home that has no add effect to the locality's infastructure!!!!

Citizens of this state are OVER taxed as it is. I thought the lottery was supposed to solve our problems with building schools but we are now worse off than before. Let the developers/builders pay a fee for new developments or housing and pass it on to the new buyer. Why would an elderly person who has lived in the same house for 65 years have to pay a fee when selling their house to afford to go a nursing home. What are our elected officials thinking of? Why not tax bank loans, or raise parking fees, or tax everyone with white houses. Where do they come up with the hair brain ideas.

Not only that, if 8 schools are costing 43 3/4 million dollars a piece, I think that we need to take a look at the contractors and see if these schools are being made out of GOLD!!!!

"But county officials point to projections of 15,000 new homes over the next decade, requiring six to eight new schools at a cost of about $350 million. They said the only other option for dealing with growth would be to raise property taxes."

Why isn't anybody asking about the money from the lottery. This is suppose to be an education lottery. I hear nothing about money helping with the schools and how much money is being moved from the state to the counties. 350 million just in additional schools for Chatham county. Grant it, that is 35 million a year, but I never hear anything about the lottery offsetting any of the costs.

When is the last time you heard of a local government laying off employees? Lay off over half of the local government employees...no one will miss them. Government gets larger and larger and it needs more money to operate. It has too many people hiding...doing nothing...most look busy but what they are doing equates to nothing. Has this option every come up?

View Comments VIEW ALL 29 COMMENTS

Multimedia

Click Here