Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

1:09 a.m. • 5-23-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 83° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 74° F
  • Sat: Clear.
    • Hi: 72° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2007-10-09 20:21:00
Updated: 2007-10-09 20:51:49

Raleigh, Wake Bond Issues Pass Easily


ELECTION 2007
ELECTION 2007
print friendly

Bond issues for open space in Raleigh and Wake County and to expand the county library system and the local community college easily gained the approval of local voters Tuesday.

Raleigh voters passed an $88 million bond issue for parks and greenway projects by a 72 to 28 percent margin. The money will allow the city to buy undeveloped land for future parks and open space, build two community centers and one aquatics facility and help fund a 13-mile greenway that will stretch from Falls Lake to the Johnston County line.

Wake County's $50 million open space bond passed almost as easily, by a 71 to 29 percent margin. The money will pay to preserve land along stream corridors to protect drinking water supplies.

A $92 million bond issue for expanding Wake Technical Community College passed by a 68 to 32 percent margin. The money will finance the completion of the college's north campus off Louisburg Road and will secure a site for a campus near Cary.

The $45 million bond for the county library system passed by a 70 to 30 percent margin. The money will pay for new branches in underserved areas and renovations to other branches.

Paying off the three county bonds will require an increase in the county's property tax rate of 2.25 cents per $100 of assessed value, based on current valuations. That would amount to about $45 per year on a $200,000 home. The county is in the process of completing a property revaluation.

Raleigh Mayor Charles Meeker said the next City Council would have to decide how to pay for Raleigh's bond issue. He said he would like to raise impact fees instead of property taxes to finance bond payments.


18 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 18 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
I can not imagine any voter who is even partially informed vote for a bond not knowing how it will be paid back. Wait, I take that back. I can see liberals voting for it only because it accomplishes the two things they do best.

1. Spend other peoples tax dollars.

2. Spend that money on nonessential projects that benefit small numbers of people.

Why do we allow some people to vote? Steve Crisp

Oh Steve, some of us aren't ready to turn our brains over to you so you can make decisions for us. It's called Democracy, don't like it? I hear Leningrad is beautiful this time of year. Flight available daily.

I'm realy glad that the open space bond passed, I wish they had asked for more money.

At this point the only thing that will keep the entire county from being paved over is for the government to put some land aside that cannot be developed. Since the plan is to preserve land around streams and watersheds this should help our water supply. I also enjoy the greenways and parks that will be developed. This will improve our quality of life and in the long term help our real estate values.

I'm so glad these bonds passed. With the Education Lottery, and the largest school bond in history passed just last election, we just haven't had any money coming into the coffers. It'd be better to just throw your money in the fireplace and set it ablaze. At least you'd get some momentary warmth from it, then.

Well, I did get out and voted against the bonds, one reason being what Steve Crisp just mentioned, among others. What I found interesting is one of the staff at my polling station said exactly what I was thinking in the separation of the bond vote from normal elections in most areas was done to sway the results to what the "powers that be" wanted.

View Comments VIEW ALL 18 COMMENTS