Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

10:38 a.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Rain.
    • Hi: 58° F
  • Sat: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 54° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Bill Seeks to Have Photo Processors Sound Child Porn Alarm


e-mail print friendly
Bill Seeks to Have Photo Finishers Report Child Pornography
Rep. Karen Ray, R-Iredell

A bill filed in the state House of Representatives offers a new approach to catching sex offenders.

Its sponsors want to require all photo shops to report child pornography images to authorities.

The bill is titled simply: "The duty to report child porn."

Legislators say its focus is to protect children.

"We're obviously after the people who abuse children," said Rep. Karen Ray, R-Iredell County and one of the sponsors.

The legislation would make it state law for any photo-finisher to report to the authorities any images of child pornography they discover in a customer’s order.

"The processors, the technicians, are the ones who may get information on such activity prior to anyone else," Ray said.

Sometimes the technicians can make a bad call, however.

Take the 2004 case of the Hamaty family. They submitted photos to an Eckerd drug store in Raleigh. One of the pictures appeared to show Charbel Hamaty kissing his infant son's groin area.

"I would never do what you all think I'm doing," Hamaty said in an interview with WRAL.

The Lebanese native spent six months in jail before the sexual assault charges were thrown out. Authorities determined the pictures were a misinterpreted display of affection.

Now his attorney, Anthony Brannon, says it's a gray area of which lawmakers should be aware.

"What the Hamaty case has shown us," Brannon said, is that "when the net is set out to catch those tunas, there can be an innocent dolphin in that net.”

The bill goes to a review committee as the next step in the legislative process.

RELATED TOPICS: Raleigh

e-mail print friendly

36 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 36 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
Hey firedad, your passion is totally justified, and I definitely understand it. My biggest fear, the one that makes my senses blank out and my mind almost shut down when it hits me, is that the unintended consequences of a law passed under a blanket such as "protect our kids!" will burn me or someone I love. I've seen so much of our freedom stripped for the purposes of SOMEONE'S security that I'm quite frankly hesitant to trust anyone in Congress anymore. In all honesty, as much as I love the freedom that America is founded upon, I see it crumbling, and once the government has stripped sufficient freedoms from us, what will we do then? Why do we allow laws to pass unhindered that can be construed to things they shouldn't be in the first place?

Yes offender I see your point, and it is completely valid. It sounds like photo developers need some sort of training or whatever. Second, you should read the law as to what constitutes child pornography and you'll notice that it is rather clear cut. I'm not saying that the law may be misinterpreted by someone but it's not a huge grey area. A law like this is good, but it seems that there must be careful consideration, and proper wording of the law before a law like this this is passed. I apologize to you for my previous comments, just happened to strike a bad nerve on a bad day.

Hey "firedad," we're not talking exclusively about child pornography here. This issue has ramifications that can seriously harm innocent people, and it would be wise of you to consider them. It could even happen to you or someone in your family, in fact. What is a totally innocent photo to a parent (nude or fully clothed) may be interpreted by a pervy high school kid processing the film as a child in a sexually suggestive position solely because he doesn't want to run the risk of getting put in jail himself...that is, if this law passes. The end result would not be "child molestors going to jail." It would be closer to "innocent families being publicly embarassed by expensive, unnecessary investigations." Also note that every law enforcement resource used on a pointless "does this look sexually suggestive to you?" investigation is a resource that isn't being used to solve real crimes involving real damage to children. I'm sorry that you don't realize this. I really am.

OFFENDER WE ARE TALKING ABOUT CHILD PORNOGRAPHY HERE!!!!! IT'S SICK AND AGAINST THE LAW!!!! There is a line between invasion of privacy and protecting our children. Apparantly you think it is ok to molest and have sex with children behind closed doors. You are absolutely sick, you make me puke.

It is something that should be done, but it shouldn't be LEGISLATED. We can't be LEGISLATING EVERYTHING. I thought photoshops reported these things ANYWAY, but by making a law out of it that forces them to do it, they'll report things they normally would be able to make a better judgment call on their own about--instead of deferring responsibility to police, which costs ME, JOE TAXPAYER, MORE F*(&$@!# MONEY EVERY YEAR TO ENFORCE. Police aren't supposed to be out there looking at everyone's family photos, they're supposed to be stopping the drug dealers from selling crack to children. Common sense, I would think, already takes care of this situation.

View Comments VIEW ALL 36 COMMENTS

Multimedia

Click Here