Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

4:59 a.m. • 5-20-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 76° F
  • Tue: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 82° F
  • Wed: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 86° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2011-10-14 12:44:00
Updated: 2011-10-17 14:10:55

Tata: Student assignment plan will move forward


Wake County Schools
Wake County Schools
print friendly

Wake County school Superintendent Tony Tata said the Board of Education will move forward with a vote Tuesday on the proposed student assignment plan, despite calls by some parents to wait.

In his weekly press briefing, Tata said it is important to seek approval as soon as possible so that parents can begin ranking their school choices in January.

At a public hearing Thursday, some parents asked leaders to delay the vote until new school board members are seated in December. Others asked that three newly elected members be involved now.

The hearing came two days after the election of four Democratic-backed school board candidates. A runoff election for the final seat will be held Nov. 8 and will decide whether the four Republican board members keep their majority or if the four Democratic members gain it. 

"I think it would be insulting to Anne McLaurin and Carolyn Morrison and Ron Margiotta to say, 'You don't get to finish your term. You don't get to do what you were elected to do,'" Tata said Friday. 

When the new board members take office, parents like Katie Sommers fear the assignment plan won't stick.

“It’s stressful that my son is going to be moving to a new school, and he keeps asking me and everyone keeps asking me, ‘Where is he going next year?’ And I can’t say where, because I don’t know for sure at this point what’s going to happen,” she said.

In 2009, a newly elected majority on the school board threw out a decade-old plan that bused students for socioeconomic diversity. For the past two years, they've been working on a new plan.

Some parents at Thursday's hearing said they wanted more focus on student achievement, as opposed to student assignment. 

“Student achievement is it,” said parent John Dion. “I don’t care who they go to school with or where they go. I just want to know when they go somewhere it’s a good school to go to.”

Tata pointed out Friday that student achievement wasn't part of older plans. 

"It was all aimed at leveling a free and reduced rate (for lunches)," he said, referring to the method used to measure family income. "Here, this plan intends to give every student displaced by a magnet school the choice to go to a top one third, 40 percent school." 

The proposed student assignment policy aims at giving parents choices for their children's education while keeping students closer to their homes. Opponents, including the state chapter of the NAACP, say the move would create pockets of poverty in the school system and segregate schools.

Under the plan, parents could choose among at least five elementary schools and two middle and high schools – including traditional, year-round, magnet and high-performing schools – based on where they live.

Parents would have priority at schools closest to their home and where children have a sibling attending. Students already enrolled in the district may also stay at their current schools. Students in schools considered low-performing will also be able to choose to attend a school that's considered high-performing, based on test scores and qualified teachers.


61 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 61 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
Bad start, Evans. Just elected and already trying to control? Trying to stop work that has been in progress for most of a year?

Yu obviously don't remember the 2010 Congress, where the Dems lame duck passed every payoff they could get their hands out for.

I'd be hard pressed to say that "voters overwhelmingly" voted for change. Look at the numbers of voters that turned out. A small percentage of people turned out for the elections. Perhaps that 20+% who voted were most impacted by the schools....

But why should this board do anything any different than any other political machine? When the presidential elections take place and there is a shift in power, the current administration doesn't just stop work. They plow forward- sometimes more fervently to complete the tasks set out BEFORE the power change. Wouldn't you?

I didn't even realize elections were held in October! I falsely thought it was the November elections. There should be a consistent schedule- one election in November, one in May. Presidential caucus should be on the SAME day nationally too - no more jockying for 1st place, but that's another story... :)

I don't understand why parents don't know where their children will be going to school next year. The plan is very clear - all children will be grandfathered in at their current schools - unless they want to enter the Choice program and then they can choose. The only students who will be required to choose next year under are the new Kindergartners.

Yes I have read the plan and Yes I have personally attended meetings and asked questions. The bottom line is that for everyone who is in the school system now nothing changes. Its all of the people who move here who will have to "choose" from available seats that are leftover after all of the grandfathering (OH - and younger siblings are Grandfathered too!). Frankly this changes nothing for my family - but I see the potential to keep new businesses away and to hurt property values. Its like "Hey we have a GREAT school - but sorry its full so you have to go somewhere else!"

"i read it and? you people act like it is god's gift to wake county"

No, just trying to be clear that your arguments prior don't go with the plan that they will vote on, you're making arguments that don't have any merit based on the plan.

Now that I know you read it, I'll just ignore your arguments since they're not valid when discussing the plan.

"Never called them losers...called them losers from Tuesday...meaning, folks who voted for candidates that lost. " - forautumn

Yes, you called people losers - it was clear. In other words, losers are those who voted for candidates who didn't win.

Childish really, don't you think?

View Comments VIEW ALL 61 COMMENTS