Education

UNC faculty working to engage athletes more in class

Posted March 13, 2012

Map Marker  Find News Near Me

— The NCAA investigation of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill football team has galvanized faculty efforts to engage the school's athletes more in classes and on campus, officials said Tuesday.

On Monday, the NCAA's Committee on Infractions put UNC on probation for three years, took away 15 football scholarships in that period and banned the team from postseason play next fall. The penalties resulted from a lengthy investigation into players' and a former assistant coach's dealings with agents and academic misconduct by players.

"The penalties are what they are," said Jan Boxill, chairwoman of the UNC Faculty Council and a professor of philosophy who has researched and written extensively about ethics in sports.

Rather than focusing on the impact of the penalties, Boxill said, she and other faculty members are more concerned about better incorporating student-athletes in UNC's academic culture.

She said she has been working directly with Director of Athletics Bubba Cunnningham and head football coach Larry Fedora in recent weeks. Both men want to make sure athletes succeed off the field as well as on, she said.

"If we want our students to be successful, faculty, staff, students and everybody is really involved," she said. "I think that it actually is bringing us together to see that we can make a difference for each other."

"I think the thing that is really impressive with this current staff is they are really focused on college students, and they have worked directly with college students," said Steve Reznick, a UNC professor of psychology and chairman of the faculty athletic committee.

UNC campus generic, UNC-Chapel Hill Faculty wants to break down campus barriers for UNC student-athletes

Reznick said he was disappointed by the NCAA sanctions, which went beyond the punishment UNC imposed on itself, because the university has improved its academic efforts for student-athletes.

"I feel like the additional sanctions are punishing people who didn't do wrong and who are actually moving forward," he said. "The only positive I can see in the sanctions is it is sending to the broader world of athletics a message – do it right."

Boxill said the investigation put a spotlight on everybody's role in balancing academics and athletics at the school.

"I don't think that the (university's) reputation has been sullied to point that we can't recover. I do think that we are recovering," she said.

4 Comments

This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • What if_I could Mar 13, 2012

    I have mixed feelings on this topic. UNC is making all these changes to make sure this does not happen again. The students that broke the rules are not paying any penalty only the school. I can't wait to see in 5-10 years where these students are in their life. Will they have the same morales as of today? These students should have been made to sit out a year from player football. No lesson learned for these students....oh yeah, a college education from a top ranked school and laughing all the way to the bank with their new football careers.

  • westernwake1 Mar 13, 2012

    Beyond the football and men's basketball team, most athletes in college tend to have high GPAs, solid study habits, and a commitment to be successful in both academics and sports.

    In most sports outside of football and basketball, there is no (or limited) professional path after college so the athletes recognize they better be successful in their studies and get a degree.

  • justabumer Mar 13, 2012

    There's a simple solution to this - require all students, athletes and non-athletes, to meet the same entrance requirements.

  • Just the facts mam Mar 13, 2012

    Study? Get an education? Are you serious???