NC regulators may force Duke to remove all coal ash dumps

Posted May 18

— North Carolina regulators say Duke Energy must dig up and close all of the more than 30 coal ash basins scattered across the state within the next eight years because of the risk they pose to the public and the environment – but they're asking state lawmakers to allow for the review of that plan within 18 months.

The Department of Environmental Quality was tasked under the 2014 coal ash law to prioritize clean-up of the dump sites containing the material, the byproduct of coal-fired energy production. Regulators classified eight of the basins as high risk and the remainder as intermediate risk, requiring the excavation and closure of the sites by the end of 2019 and 2024, respectively.

DEQ regulators based their rankings on the potential impacts of groundwater and surface water, as well as the safety of dams holding the slurry of coal ash and water in place.

Low Intermediate High

Explore the coal ash classifications

Find out more about how environmental regulators classified the 33 coal ash ponds across the state near Duke Energy's 14 power plants. Click on a pond marker to see the classifications, or select plant to get an overview.

But in a press release Wednesday morning, DEQ Secretary Donald van der Vaart said deadlines in the coal ash law are "too compressed" to allow for changing information, such as ongoing repairs to dams or plans to provide alternative water sources to nearby well owners. That's why he said the agency is pushing for the General Assembly to allow the review of the classifications in a year-and-a-half.

"The focus of the coal ash law was to safely close all coal ash ponds in North Carolina,” van der Vaart said. "The intent was not to set pond closure deadlines based on incomplete information. Making decisions based on incomplete information could lead to the expenditure of billions of dollars when spending millions now would provide equal or better protection."

Re-evaluating the risk levels could allow regulators to deem some ponds low risk, which would extend the closing deadline to 2029 and allow the coal ash to be covered and left in place instead of dug up and removed.

Duke CEO: excavation 'the most extreme option'

In a video statement released Wednesday afternoon, Duke Energy President and CEO Lynn Good called DEQ's announcement "an important milestone" in the closure of the basins, but said it's an acknowledgement that the "information is incomplete."

"If the state chooses to allow these rankings to stand without the benefit of additional information and additional work, then North Carolina will have chosen the most extreme option to close the ash basins, an option that will cost our customers more money, impact our communities for a very long time and result in no real environmental benefit," Good said in the statement.

Coal ash DEQ cites Duke for leaky coal ash ponds

The company said it will push for clarifications to the coal ash law within 60 days, after which DEQ's proposed recommendations will become final. But on a conference call with reporters Wednesday afternoon, Good wouldn't provide specifics on what changes the company would like to see, saying only the law needed more flexibility to incorporate new information such as dam repairs.

That work may be finished within the next six months, she said.

Good also told reporters the company disagreed with DEQ's position that a legislative change was needed to review the classifications in 18 months.

"We believe DEQ can reassess as they do with existing regulations," Good said.

If the coal ash ponds classified as intermediate risk aren't reduced, which would give the company the option to cap in place, Good said the risk of not meeting the 2024 deadline for cleanup was "signficant." The company has maintained that draining the unlined pits of water and covering them with a liner and vegetation would save money and protect the environment as well as excavation.

Environmental groups have been pressing the state and Duke for years to clean up the pits, many of which have been leaking contaminants into the soil for decades. And they haven't been satisfied with proposals to simply cover the waste, which they argue will allow pollution to persist.

"Today’s classifications are a testimony to the persistence of committed and engaged communities advocating for safe drinking water," Emma Greenbaum, an organizer for for the Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal campaign in North Carolina, said in a statement. "While today’s announcement represents a significant step forward, families living near coal ash ponds will continue to face uncertainty about their drinking water until the coal ash is removed and stored away from water sources."

But North Carolina Sierra Club State Director Molly Diggins said she was concerned by the request to review the classifications, which she said could lead to "unilateral decision making."

"It’s unclear what oversight or public input there will be if these classifications can be revisited immediately before the deadline for closure plans," Diggins said. "This is exactly what the legislature sought to avoid when drafting the Coal Ash Management Act."

Attorneys with the Southern Environmental Law Center, which is suing Duke over coal ash cleanup, also criticized the move, arguing that state lawmakers wanted environmental regulators to assess the risks of the basins as they exist today, rather than in 18 months.

SELC attorney Frank Holleman said the move is part of a pattern of a unnecessary delay by the environmental agency, which has been regulating the coal ash basins for decades and should have all the information it needs to move ahead.

"This is Duke Energy finally being held accountable," SELC attorney Frank Holleman said. "Yet what DEQ wants to do is give them another extension, find another way to let them get off the hook and leave our groundwater, our rivers polluted forever by Duke Energy's unlined coal ash storage."

Officials with DEQ said no one for the agency was available for an on-camera interview Wednesday.

DEQ's proposed classifications follow a draft report released late last year that said most of the ponds need to be excavated.

Four of those ponds at the time were deemed low risk, and about a third were designated low to intermediate risk while regulators waited on more information from Duke.

Duke exploring alternative water sources for well owners

The last several years have seen renewed attention in coal ash after a busted stormwater pipe spilled tons of the heavy metal-laced material into the Dan River near Eden in February 2014.

In addition to requiring a plan to cleanup and close statewide coal ash basins, the legislation that followed the Dan River spill required state officials to test well water for residents living near the ponds and to determine if any contamination was the result of coal ash pollution.

Clean Water Testimony shows DHHS doctor opposed move to declare wells near coal ash safe

While agency regulators are still trying to answer that question, tests have shown elevated concentrations of contaminants in hundreds of wells, leading state health officials to advise in 2015 homeowners not to use the water for drinking and cooking. Since then, they've been drinking bottled water supplied by Duke Energy.

Over the objections of one its top doctors, the Department of Health and Human Services and DEQ retracted those do-not-drink advisories in March.

In its release, DEQ maintained residents' well water "meets federal requirements for safe drinking water," but noted that the energy company is evaluating supplying well owners with "permanent alternative water."

Many well owners say they still don't trust their wells and continue to rely on the Duke-supplied bottled water, although the company has acknowledged that the measure is a temporary one.

Asking the legislature for the ability to redo the classifications next year, environmental groups say, will likely force residents to wait longer for solutions.

"There are loopholes here that allow Duke to just kick the can down the road as far as cleanup goes," Sam Perkins, Catawba Riverkeeper, said in a statement. "There are hundreds of families across the state still living with contaminated water and have no idea when their communities will actually be cleaned up."


Please with your account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Edward Anderson May 19, 12:43 p.m.
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Duke Power customers are not to blame for this and they haven't been "reaping" any cheap electricity. The _Shareholders_ and _Top Executives_, who have been slurping up the profits by delaying this expense need to cough up the expenses now. Time to pay the piper.

  • Lance Boyle May 19, 12:18 a.m.
    user avatar

    Ha, A short term sabre rattle for a long term do nothing.

  • Terica Luxton May 18, 9:33 p.m.
    user avatar

    We don't want #coalash in #Sanford , Liners Leak! This is #Dumping Not a reclamation of a brickyard. Duke can keep their ash out of our county.

  • Paul Edwards May 18, 7:31 p.m.
    user avatar

    Roger Conner it makes about as much sense as what a platoon sergeant said to me in 1962 in basic training. He said "dig a hole." I asked where do you want me to put the dirt from the hole? He said, "dig another hole and put it in!"

  • Roger Connor May 18, 7:01 p.m.
    user avatar

    So, the environmentalists are at it again. They want "something done NOW" without considering ALL the consequences. For starters: If you dig it up, exactly WHERE is the material to be put, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Second, this addresses the current crop of disposal sites for generator waste; WHAT about the generation of future waste: How is that to be dealt with. And for you folks angry at Duke Energy- THEY are not the only people producing electricity with flyash as the waste - how about the other generators? Last but not least: for you Democrats blaming McCory and the GOP- THIS situation had many years in the making with the total blessings of the Democrats in power at the time, all the way back to before Hunt's first term! Lets deal with the problems and potential problems in a reasoned way that will be the maximum benefit to the State.

  • Demute Sainte May 18, 5:53 p.m.
    user avatar

    Clean it all up! The State has turned a blind eye to this mess for decades. Now its time to deal with it. And be sure to pass along all of the expense to Duke Power customers. They have enjoyed decades of cheap electricity... its time to start really paying for it cost.

  • Wayne Rossignol May 18, 5:10 p.m.
    user avatar

    FORCE them??? I don't think so. There is NO choice. Do it or put the top rung in jail. Eight years? How about 4? Contaminating people's drinking water. Is this Flint?? Put their buddy McLooney in jail with them.

  • Buck Winslow May 18, 1:09 p.m.
    user avatar

    While McCrory is in office, I will believe it when I see them digging and not a minute before.