Raleigh, N.C. — On a party-line vote, the House Rules Committee on Tuesday approved a resolution opposing any push for more gun control at the federal level.
House Resolution 63, sponsored by freshman Rep. Michael Speciale, R-Craven, says (as amended) "The House of Representatives expresses support of the constitutional right of the people of this State to keep and bear arms and opposes any infringement by the federal government of the right of the people of this State to keep and bear arms."
"We right now have an out-of-control federal government," Speciale told the committee. "We here in the North Carolina General Assembly are the last bastion of hope between citizens and an ever-encroaching federal government."
The resolution says "Infringements such as registering guns, banning certain kinds of weapons and accessories, requiring extreme background checks, and restricting concealed carry permits" have not been been proven to protect public safety.
It also blames Democratic President Barack Obama and Vice-President Joe Biden for being the driving force behind the push for further infringements.
Asked whether any gun control legislation has yet been introduced, Speciale said he wasn't sure but said his bill covers "some of the things (gun control advocates) were talking about."
"Every time there's an incident, they want to infringe on our right to keep and bear arms, and it's a right," Speciale told the committee. "We just don't want any more infringement on our rights that have already been infringed upon."
Resolutions don't carry the force of law, staff explained; they simply express the opinion of the House.
"It's something designed to send to our congressional delegation, letting them know, 'You need to be there to protect us. You need to protect our rights,'" Speciale said.
Democrats took issue with the resolution, calling it "pointless" and "political."
"I don't understand why we have to have this resolution, if it's not specifically aimed at one proposal we would support or not support in Congress," said Rep. Becky Carney, D-Mecklenburg.
"Do resolutions have to be factual, or can you just make stuff up?" Rep. Marcus Brandon, D-Guilford, asked Rules Committee Chairman Tim Moore.
"There's absolutely no fact in that bill," Brandon said later. "It's an opinion,and everybody's entitled to their opinion. But to force it down on the House?"
The measure passed 12-7, with all Republicans voting for it and all Democrats voting against it. Its next stop is the House floor.




![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/national_world/national/2013/05/14/12445890/12446751-1368816960-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/2013/05/13/12441232/hahn-100x75.jpg)
![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/business/2013/05/06/12417151/2457a21a00d94324b6fc448c8ec173d0-Photo-1-100x70.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/28/12278304/LNL-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/04/12182235/12182236-1362457268-100x75.jpg)






WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
The ones that make it illegal to lie on your form 4473. Over 30,000 folks were guilty of that (denying they were a felon, when NICS would come back that they were).
nearly 0 of them were prosecuted for it.
That's up to 30,000 people, in just 1 year, who would've been put in jail instead of turned back out to go find another route to illegally obtaining a gun.
another reason to mandate secure storage- Grand Union
The supreme court already spoke to this in the Heller decision-
"the requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock makes it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitutional"
If your suggested law means I have to tell the guy breaking into my house "Hey, hang on for a few minutes while I go unlock my gun to defend myself" then that law is unconstitutional.
March 6, 2013 6:13 p.m.
which laws are those?
" Law abiding folks do NOT need any restrictions - NONE. Let the have machine guns and submarines and satellites and drones. Only the CRIMINALS need to be restricted as they are the only" problem."
LOL perhaps you want to be on the airliner which happens to be shot at with a stinger missile by a person who wasn't a criminal until the second he pulls the trigger?
" And the laws already prevent them from having ANY weapon at any time anywhere!"
Thats the whole point, existing laws prevent very little, merely punish people when its already too late.
March 6, 2013 2:33 p.m.
likely just dely them as there are so many ways to get a gun that avoids a background check
" How many where citizens who shouldn't have been denied ?"
please show that any were and that there is no appeals process....
" They won't stop in the middle of a theft of firearms to get a background check."
another reason to mandate secure storage......stealing one from a nightstand is a little easier than from a bolted down 500lb safe.
" I've known people who have been denied due to paperwork errors."
permanently denied or just delayed?
March 6, 2013 12:54 p.m.
We seem to have more than enough guns.
Where are the jobs?
March 6, 2013 10:29 a.m.
Thanks for your opinion. Anytime you want to have a specific discussion on the issues rather than a vague rant about Obama supporters not following the Constitution, I'll be happy to oblige you.
March 6, 2013 9:44 a.m.
It certainly made it harder and undoubtably prevented guns from getting into the hands of individuals who shouldn't have them. A great example is mandatory checking for underage alcohol IDs. Sure some people manage to get access to alcohol but statistics show, beyond any doubt, that it has saved lives.
March 6, 2013 9:41 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:09 p.m.
March 5, 2013 7:53 p.m.
March 5, 2013 7:47 p.m.
I would say YES! I would also say that there are too many people in this Country that have no idea/no care of;
The Constitution The Declaration of Independence The Bill of Rights etc,etc,etc.
The problem arises when too many "un-learned" voters cast a ballot because of ignorance, arrogance or ideology. Democrats/Republicans alike.
"We The People" are becoming nothing less than "The Ruled." By sycophant ideological, self-righteous Local/State/Federal Politicians who could care less about the governing documents of this Country.
Obama, and all those who support him are of the above ilk!
March 5, 2013 6:25 p.m.