Lawmakers work to redraw congressional maps, delay elections

Posted February 18, 2016
Updated March 11, 2016

— Members of the House and the Senate carefully, if sometimes testily, picked their way through the process of redrawing the maps governing North Carolina's 13 U.S. House districts Thursday.

Meanwhile, House members were getting ready to debate a bill that would set elections in those new districts for June 7.

Senators voted 32-15, mainly along party lines, to approve a new set of maps, while House members worked to create a new schedule for any congressional elections.

"This map before us is what we consider an answer to what the court asked us to do," Sen. Bob Rucho, R-Mecklenburg, told his colleagues.

But Rucho and his fellow Republicans encountered criticism of their efforts, saying they've merely replaced a racial gerrymander with one based on party affiliation.

"Friends, we live in North Carolina, not North Korea," said Sen. Josh Stein, D-Wake. "Voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around."

Following the 2010 election, Republicans took control of the General Assembly and the ability to redraw the districts from which U.S. House members are elected. Those maps became the subject of state and federal lawsuits almost as soon as they were completed. A trio of federal judges decided two weeks ago that lawmakers had unconstitutionally relied too much on race in drawing two districts and ordered lawmakers to redraw them by Friday.

Mapping the way

The major criticism the three-judge panel leveled at the 2011 congressional maps was that more than half the voters in the 1st District and the 12th District were black.

The effort to ensure more than 50 percent of voters were black in that district, and District 12, which stretched from Charlotte to Greensboro, was unconstitutional, the court said, and diluted minority strength in other areas.

In the 1st District, which sprawls through northeastern North Carolina, the black voting-age population dropped from 52 percent to 44 percent on the newly drawn maps. The black voting population in the 12th District, which stretched from Charlotte to Greensboro, would drop from 50 percent on the old maps to 35 percent on the redrawn map.

The new map appears to be more racially integrated than the current one. Of the 10 Republican-leaning districts, eight are more diverse than they were under the 2011 maps. It also keeps 87 of North Carolina's counties together, eliminating the serpentine tentacles that characterized the districts drawn five years ago.

"At least we finally got a map that makes sense when you look at it," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Brown, R-Onslow.

While the maps are easier to understand, Democrats insisted that they still would run afoul of constitutional requirements.

"By dealing with one constitutional problem ... what you have done is create another constitutional problem with political gerrymandering," Stein said.

He pointed to statistics showing that, while half of the voters in North Carolina cast ballots for Democratic congressional candidates in 2014, only three Democrats were elected to Congress.

"This brazen gerrymander undermines our democracy," he said.

But Brown pointed out that an analysis that accompanied the newly drawn maps showed some Democrats, particularly Attorney General Roy Cooper, could win even in Republican-leaning districts.

"For you to say how gerrymandered this map is when a Democrat could win every single district, it makes no sense," Brown said.

At other points on the Senate floor, Democrats pushed Rucho and his colleagues as to whether consultants might not have initially looked at racial data before getting instructions to rely solely on political and other factors.

"Perhaps the consultant wasn't completely bound by those instructions," Sen. Floyd McKissick, D-Durham, said.

Rucho insisted that the consultant followed lawmakers' instructions to follow county lines as much as possible.

Senators also rejected an amendment by Sen. Jeff Jackson, D-Mecklenburg, that would have created a nonpartisan redistricting commission.

The new map goes to the state House for consideration on Friday.

Timing is at issue

As senators debated the new maps, the House Redistricting Committee debated timing, struggling to find a date for new congressional elections.

Voting by mail has already begun for North Carolina's March 15 primary, which was to include congressional elections, but with the maps up in the air, those races would likely have to shift to another date. Elections Director Kim Strach told the committee that a separate statewide election would cost the state $9.5 million.

Another potential difficulty had to do with North Carolina's runoff election laws. If no candidate gets 40 percent of the vote in a first primary, the front-runner can be challenged to a second primary.

State law says that only voters who voted in the first primary can vote in the second. If the state tried to hold the new congressional primary on the same day it held its primary runoffs, Strach said, two slightly different sets of voters would be eligible.

"We do not have the capability in our electronic poll books to hold a first primary and second primary on the same day," Strach told the committee.

Lawmakers have tentatively solved that problem by eliminating second primaries.


Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Hamilton Bean Feb 18, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    And what of the Dems who, for OVER 100 years and on a regular basis, gerrymandered the states election districts? To what end you ask?? Well, to ensure continued seats in power from which to continue and enforce Jim Crow laws; to work as hard as they could to keep the poor and African Americans from voting ( poll taxes, literacy tests), to enforce racial segregation through whatever means available ( the KKK). Yet some low information voters continue to slam Republicans who have worked hard to reverse the 100 or so years of Dem. tax and wasteful spending and to improve the condition of the poor and minorities. The taste of hypocrisy must sit well in their mouths.

  • Matt Nickeson Feb 18, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Does it really matter? Like most others I would guess that you would call whatever organization that did run such numbers biased if they didn't buttress your pre-conceived notion. In these days of blind hyperpartisanship facts matter little.

  • Fanny Chmelar Feb 18, 2016
    user avatar

    Anyone have a dollar amount on how much the Republican Legislature's laws have cost vs what their legislation has brought in for NC?

    Seems like a lot of reports come in about jobs that were not created directly because of their decisions. How much is lost to tax breaks to the wealthy. How much is lost in the courts. How much we pay other lawyers to do Cooper's job because they know he'll be objective - I mean, because they know they're in the wrong and he'll do the right thing - no, I mean, because they think he's a threat? I know unemployment is down, but is it as far as it could have been?

    It's not that I'm too lazy to run the numbers, it's that I don't have enough experience to do it accurately. Curious if anyone knows of any group (non-partisan) that did it objectively?

  • Dale Xavier Feb 18, 2016
    user avatar

    RId NC of Republican control next election. They have ruined our state and our reputation. Repugnant people.

  • Clarence Drumgoole Feb 18, 2016
    user avatar

    Unacceptable behavior! The intelligence of North Carolinian's is being insulted.